Well, we dress in "bicycle race" shirts, not camo nowadays.... I was involved in IPSC for some years & won 2nd place in the national championships in 1976 using a Colt 1911 gold cup but i did not have to dress in camo to do it!
Well, we dress in "bicycle race" shirts, not camo nowadays.... I was involved in IPSC for some years & won 2nd place in the national championships in 1976 using a Colt 1911 gold cup but i did not have to dress in camo to do it!
I think this discussion has gone off the rails i personally do not have an issue with tactical rifles i carried one for 4 years the point i am trying to make is dressing in tactical gear at the rifle range gives the left wing turds an opportunity to brand shooters as right wing extremists , left wing extremists get a free ride in this country our political system is a mess.
As long as you don't have the tight shorts!
Sounds like you are ready to jump into 3-Gun. Way (way!) more fun than IPSC/USPSA, IMO. Pretty sure you can figure the rifle part out.Have you ever fired a "tactical semi-automatic shotgun". I just finished a 4 day course with my Beretta 1301 Tactical with an 18.5 inch barrel (45.3cm). It holds 7 rounds plus 1.
I can fire it and reload it much faster than a pump action shotgun. As a matter of fact at the end of the course there was a test on various skills under time pressure and I finished ahead of everyone including guys with pump action shotguns. That despite the fact that I had never fired that shotgun prior to the course and did not even know how to unload the magazine without firing it or making the bolt stay back on an empty gun (reason I took the course).
That shotgun definitely will be my choice of weapon for close quarters social work.
Finally, there is no such thing as a dangerous weapon, just dangerous men.
3-Gun in CA is a no go for those not grandfathered in with those scary black guns. If I were to start a new shooting sport it would be PRS.Sounds like you are ready to jump into 3-Gun. Way (way!) more fun than IPSC/USPSA, IMO. Pretty sure you can figure the rifle part out.
Understood, and one of the reasons I turned down a company transfer to Cali many years ago. (This was before things got so bad, but the writing was on the wall.)3-Gun in CA is a no go for those not grandfathered in with those scary black guns. If I were to start a new shooting sport it would be PRS.
You actually make the case for exactly what I am saying. Feel sorry for you living in Australia . But the leftist Democrats are true Communist who lie and cheat to get what they want. That is why we have a 2 nd amendment to prevent Government overreach Godbless you.You can not own a Remington model8 or any semi auto in Australia since the Port Arthur shootings in 1995 & there is a strong believe it was a set up by the government for more gun control, & it worked. We are going into a federal election year the Labour party, similar to your Joe Biden administration is very anti gun & will stop at nothing to achieve their left wing agenda so feeding the media which is mainly left wing, oppotunites to brand shooters as right extremests does not do our cause any good, we do not have a 2nd amendment in this country the labour state governments closed down gun shops during the early covert virus for pubic safety so thats what we are up against . I was involved in IPSC for some years & won 2nd place in the national championships in 1976 using a Colt 1911 gold cup but i did not have to dress in camo to do it!
In fairness, I play plenty of Call of Duty. Which, aside from loving history and vintage stuff, is why I bought a M91/30, No. 4, and M1 Garand. My Vietnam-style USGI-parts M14 was a direct result of playing CoD: Black Ops. I still want some of them modern guns cause I like the idea of having the evolution of the infantry rifle over the last century. But I'm more likely to buy something 1960s-70s or earlier than I am to buy something from the last 20 years.Every kid my age age grew up playing “Call of Duty” they then want the guns they used in the game. Most didn’t grow up hunting birds in the backyard with a daisy like I did. And most weren’t given a gun for Christmas like I got when I was 10.
When they are old enough to have a big a gun, they have money to do so (if they work) and they want the M4 carbine from “Modern warfare” not the Winchester 94.
I think this is good, provided that they receive proper gun safety training.
Just remember the second amendment is not at all about hunting.
I think this discussion has gone off the rails i personally do not have an issue with tactical rifles i carried one for 4 years the point i am trying to make is dressing in tactical gear at the rifle range gives the left wing turds an opportunity to brand shooters as right wing extremists , left wing extremists get a free ride in this country our political system is a mess.
We have a morning news program in Australia hosted by a arrogant egg headed A-hole more left wing than i can stand,The problem is the left wing media not the guys dressing in tactical gear. Apparently wearing khakis and a a white button down (patriot front) is now a scary white supremist outfit. Also tiki torches...racist. The point I am trying to make is the media will try to frame anything they can to fit a narrative, changing behaviors to appease others sensitivities is not a long term winning strategy.
I wonder how many who have done the same,only with Red Dead Redemption as their background for interest.In fairness, I play plenty of Call of Duty. Which, aside from loving history and vintage stuff, is why I bought a M91/30, No. 4, and M1 Garand. My Vietnam-style USGI-parts M14 was a direct result of playing CoD: Black Ops. I still want some of them modern guns cause I like the idea of having the evolution of the infantry rifle over the last century. But I'm more likely to buy something 1960s-70s or earlier than I am to buy something from the last 20 years.