1:66 twiste@d
AH senior member
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2023
- Messages
- 50
- Reaction score
- 102
Most of Alaska is now 2-5 black bear, 10 wolves, 1-2 brown bear.We "bust a cap" on those SOB's every chance we get.
Most of Alaska is now 2-5 black bear, 10 wolves, 1-2 brown bear.We "bust a cap" on those SOB's every chance we get.
Oh I know these things, but was too much like other canine friends I had........ No, I know, but just saying...........Don't feel bad about the wolf... that feeling would go away if you watched wolves yank a calf moose out of a cow giving birth while she is running to escape.
Oh no worries, I shot plenty of black and brown bears, leopard, lions, Cougars, and probably others, never a concern or any feelings at all...... I just did not care much for shooting a canine.... the rest, don't care...... and if it was causing a problem then I bust a cap on them anyway........Right, and black bears are even worse. Its funny in a sick way, hunters will spend big money to hunt deer, moose and caribou. But when it comes time to thin out the predator population most won't even consider it.
These fools "Identify" as most anything these days, so I would not be surprised at all if some idiot identified as a rabbit, fact is, that would be more desirable that some other things they identify as....Wolves are dangerous game if you identify as a rabbit.
Oh no worries, I shot plenty of black and brown bears, leopard, lions, Cougars, and probably others, never a concern or any feelings at all....
Just think of a wolf as a large chihuahua and you won’t feel so bad.Yeah, I have thought about doing something similar, however, I am just not talented enough to make something that looks decent, I would have my gun wrapped in black duck tape to hold it on...... Whew....... I never learned to roll with that steel cresent plate, and it just is not much fun with heavy loads....
In reality I like the Uberti much better, I have had this gun for years on top of years..... I carried it in Alaska in 2000 and took the only moose I have ever shot and a wolf as well.......
Hmmm...... Wolf, is that Dangerous Game? 45/70 did a pretty good job on it........ I did not like myself after that very much however, personal thing I suppose...... It was a snap decision ............I did not think, just did........
Lever guns and Lever Cartridges....... all good....... but done way more with bolt guns..........
Honest question: what’s the appeal?
Archery I can understand: different skill set
Handgun I understand: different skill set...
... a higher chance of things going wrong and a less-than-clean kill.
Here's my latest rat stopper. I've even installed a suppressor so they don't hear all that lethality coming....
View attachment 590100
Honest question: what’s the appeal?
Archery I can understand: different skill set
Handgun I understand: different skill set
Rifle under the legal limit in most places? I just don’t get it. Whether I shoot a buffalo with my 404 or a 243, it’s pretty much the same on my end: stalk within 50 yards or closer, shoot animal with rifle. No additional challenge or different skill set, just a higher chance of things going wrong and a less-than-clean kill.
My point being the hunt is no more difficult with an inadequate weapon, only the kill. The stalk is the same, the skill of shooting is the same. It’s just more likely to wound the animal and cause undue suffering. If it required more or even different skills or presented a different challenge, I can understand it. But it doesn’t. If one can shoot a buffalo with a 375, one can shoot a buffalo with a 45-70. Literally no additional challenge, just an increased chance of wounding the animal without killing it. While I don’t necessarily agree, the very people who are supporting the 45-70 say it is perfectly adequate, ie, no additional challenge. It is others who are suggesting it is inadequate. (Others to include the legal authorities in many countries). Did they put those laws in placeYou answered your own question... everything is on a sliding scale from very, very easy, to very, very difficult...
On the "X" end, you have a kitchen knife, on the "Y" end, you have a Sherman tank... everything in between represents various levels of difficulty and intrigue... every one is entitled (within legal limits) to dance wherever they want to on that scale.
This makes sense. If you like the platformHey @Bert the Turtle ... Speaking strictly for myself, it's the platform: I like hunting with lever action rifles. I haven't used anything but a lever action in close to 20 years. So when I went to Africa for the first time 3 years ago, the only thing I had was my .45-70. As I have shared, my PH was good with it, and worked with me to decide on a load. It worked, and I have used it a second time, and likely will again. Also, I don't have unlimited means to spend on stuff, so anything above a run of the mill .45-70, as far as power level in a lever action, would likely cost more than I have or would want to spend. So, I accept my limitations, and work diligently on finding an effective load to be able to use the one I have.
Strictly for longer LOP. Does nothing to prevent pregnancy or shoulder degradation.And a condom on the other end.....
You should start a thread on .223 for deer...My point being the hunt is no more difficult with an inadequate weapon, only the kill. The stalk is the same, the skill of shooting is the same. It’s just more likely to wound the animal and cause undue suffering. If it required more or even different skills or presented a different challenge, I can understand it. But it doesn’t. If one can shoot a buffalo with a 375, one can shoot a buffalo with a 45-70. Literally no additional challenge, just an increased chance of wounding the animal without killing it. While I don’t necessarily agree, the very people who are supporting the 45-70 say it is perfectly adequate, ie, no additional challenge. It is others who are suggesting it is inadequate. (Others to include the legal authorities in many countries). Did they put those laws in place
Simply to thwart people’s fun? No, they put them in place because experience shows what is and is not generally adequate most of the time- out of respect for the animals and the sport.
Opps..... Busted.... Ok it was a 405 CEB .500 caliber solid at 2120 fps...........What was your hippo load Michael?
I do love a traditional type lever gun, reality is, lever guns only account for far less than 5% of my time in the field. Most all of my shooting has been done with Bolt Guns, and 85-90% of those have been 458 caliber +.......... I also like single shots, 1885 and Ruger #1s, I also like semi guns as well, the working kind. I like handguns, 45 ACP and 45 Colt............. I like many sorts of firearms and have been shooting a long time...........The only thing I don't care much for is shotguns and double rifles.......You are a true lever gun junkie! Respect.
Must have grown up on John Wayne Westerns?
My point being the hunt is no more difficult with an inadequate weapon, only the kill. The stalk is the same, the skill of shooting is the same. It’s just more likely to wound the animal and cause undue suffering. If it required more or even different skills or presented a different challenge, I can understand it. But it doesn’t. If one can shoot a buffalo with a 375, one can shoot a buffalo with a 45-70.
I have just the bullet for that mission....... HEHH HEH......You should start a thread on .223 for deer...