1 MOA Hoax

Then you do not understand what difference you are buying. Their are reasons why better guns cost more money. If you shoot a lot it will not take long to figure it out.
What I am saying is that from a pure hunting scenario there is little difference these days. Sure for banging steel at 1000yd+ there is a difference and it is fun!
 
What I am saying is that from a pure hunting scenario there is little difference these days. Sure for banging steel at 1000yd+ there is a difference and it is fun!

It is more than just that. 1MOA is an accuracy standard. The problem is you start getting into field conditions and things go south. I have seen actions, get locked up due to dust, triggers go down for dust, blown primers, being cold has also caused some of those same things to happen. I have seen the same type of things with scopes.

The extra money does get spent on nicer components sure, with that usually (not always) comes more robust components that equal a more reliable system. Their are reasons cheap barrel have cold bore shifts, cheap triggers feel like trash, and the bolts on cheap actions do not feel smooth.
 
This video does not surprise me at all...

It is entirely consistent with my experience, both civilian (and military in a former life, when I saw a lot of people shoot).

The simple facts are:

1) It is a rare modern factory rifle indeed, regardless of brand and price, with CNC machined action, barrel and synthetic stock mold, that does not shoot 1 MOA with at least some of the myriad factory ammo;​
2) Most shooters, and even more to the point: most hunters, do not have the shooting technical knowledge and training necessary to shoot 1 MOA, regardless of the rifle they use;​
3) I do not believe that many folks active on AH are statistically representative of "most shooters" or "most hunters", like random folks on a public shooting range are;​
4) Of course, one can be sure that a warranty control group shot by a manufacturer will be shot by a professional, in ideal laboratory conditions, with a specific load, etc. which essentially explains why such warranty is mostly irrelevant to the real world because users and conditions will be different...​

How this all relates to big game hunting killing shots...

Actually, even 3 MOA is completely fine with the vast majority of hunting shots out to 300 yards!

I know, I know, what a provocative statement, right? :oops:

Here is why...

1) Let us clarify that 1 MOA translates to 1" at 100 yards (well, not quite exactly, the real number is 1.047″ but who cares for hunting at 300 yards!); ~2" at 200 yards, ~3" at 300 yards, etc.

2) Based on common sense observation, and confirmed in Jack O'Connor's book The Hunting Rifle and other sources, the vital areas of common game are:
  • Pronghorn / small deer / small African antelopes: ~8" to 9". A 9" circle represents 3 MOA at 300 yards...
  • Medium size deer / medium African antelope: ~10" to 11". A 11" circle represents 3.6 MOA at 300 yards...
  • Large deer / North American wild sheep / mountain goat: ~11" to 14". A 14" circle represents 4.6 MOA at 300 yards...
  • Elk / large African antelope: ~14" to 16". A 16" circle represents 5.3 MOA at 300 yards...
  • Moose / Eland: ~18" to 21". A 21" circle represents 7 MOA at 300 yards...
And this, gentlemen, is why most hunters (even very casual ones who shoot 1 box of ammo in 3 years' time) are generally capable of killing game: 3 MOA groups are plenty good out to 300 yards!

Actually, for dense-woods or dense-bush hunters who only take 100 yards shots, a 6 MOA rifles if perfectly OK, because it is a small deer indeed that has a vital area less than 6" wide...

Another fun test...

Here in Arizona, where most hunters will sooner or later brag about their 600 or 800 yards elk, another fun test is to invite them to shoot an 18" plate at said distance. Warning: a considerable amount of ammo can be consumed, and feelings can get hurt :E Rofl:
Agree with your points and would add that even “off hits” can be fatal {with a little luck} ie: miss a deer high = spine, too far forward & high = neck, far back & low = femoral artery....even a gut shot kills in 12-24 hour...plus you might get a follow up shot on the wounded animal, as I mentioned “a little luck”. Now, no one wants to gut shoot game or count on a spine or neck shot and should practice to avoid such hits or refrain from taking bad shots but many hunters take their trophy’s home with “off hits”. I also think these “off hits” are often left out of the “campfire stories” later retold about the Great Shot they made on that big buck etc.. For me, making a bad shot on a big game animal - even when recovered - takes much of joy out of that trophy....makes me practice even more.
 
It is more than just that. 1MOA is an accuracy standard. The problem is you start getting into field conditions and things go south. I have seen actions, get locked up due to dust, triggers go down for dust, blown primers, being cold has also caused some of those same things to happen. I have seen the same type of things with scopes.

The extra money does get spent on nicer components sure, with that usually (not always) comes more robust components that equal a more reliable system. Their are reasons cheap barrel have cold bore shifts, cheap triggers feel like trash, and the bolts on cheap actions do not feel smooth.
A question on triggers, a minor problem that I find with good triggers: Once you shoot a rifle with a great trigger (crisp, 3lb. pull) and get use to that - you will have difficulty shooting poor triggers. You get “spoiled” but someone switching from a bad trigger (6lbs. Lots of creep) can adjust easily to a Great trigger. I never thought much about triggers when I was younger but now I almost “require” a good rifle trigger to shoot well.
 
It is more than just that. 1MOA is an accuracy standard. The problem is you start getting into field conditions and things go south. I have seen actions, get locked up due to dust, triggers go down for dust, blown primers, being cold has also caused some of those same things to happen. I have seen the same type of things with scopes.

The extra money does get spent on nicer components sure, with that usually (not always) comes more robust components that equal a more reliable system. There are reasons cheap barrel have cold bore shifts, cheap triggers feel like trash, and the bolts on cheap actions do not feel smooth.
I agree in some respects. I've heard that the Timney triggers require constant maintenance in the field. Like a lot of things they are great at the range but not so great in the field. Just an example of what is considered top quality yet won't perform.
 
One factor I think this video lacks and is commonly overlooked is the quality of optics. When I was younger I spent 70% of my budget on a rifle and then whatever was left was fine for a scope. Ammo prior to reloading was just the cheapest federal on sale. I wouldn’t achieve 1 MOA consistently with that setup even today.

I’m not familiar with this YouTuber but I would enjoy seeing this challenge include a follow up where he looks at the equipment and identifies the weakest links. Maybe they are using a 20 year old tasco or maybe the ammo/bullet weight isn’t ideal for the barrel.

Another option to make this more scientific would be after using their own equipment for the challenge, have these shooters use a custom rifle with an ideal reloaded round to show what is the limiting factor. If the result is 2 MOA with their own gear but 0.5 MOA with a custom rifle with a demonstrated capability of 0.3 MOA; then this would clearly show the shooter has more capability than the equipment. I would expect most often it’s a mix of capability and proper equipment.

To say 1 MOA is a hoax just seems like clickbait or an easy answer to a more complex problem. Identifying why most people aren’t consistently able to demonstrate precision even at the range in somewhat ideal conditions would be far more interesting to me.
 
Okay, I realize that I'm hijacking this thread and possibly throwing a bomb, but honestly....
How is it possible to shoot and kill 50 MILLION buffalo with the resources available in 1850-1870????
How much black powder is that?
How many tons of lead?
Yeah as someone with a Minor in Wildlife Biology, I always cringe when I hear that there were 60 million buffalo back then. Total made-up BS to make the white man European look even worse. Probably was 1/5th of that claim.
 
I agree in some respects. I've heard that the Timney triggers require constant maintenance in the field. Like a lot of things they are great at the range but not so great in the field. Just an example of what is considered top quality yet won't perform.
@phillip Glass
Never had a problem with a timney in the field even in very dusty conditions. Mine are set a 2# as that the weight I like.
Bob
 
Same as Bob on timney.

I’ve got them on about a half dozen hard use hunting rifles ranging from .223 to .416… and have had them on both competition and precision (work) rifles… never a problem with any of them, regardless of level of use or environment used in..

I have literally trusted my life and the lives of my team members to timney… quality and reliability has never been in question..
 
Okay, I realize that I'm hijacking this thread and possibly throwing a bomb, but honestly....
How is it possible to shoot and kill 50 MILLION buffalo with the resources available in 1850-1870????
How much black powder is that?
How many tons of lead?
Here’s an interesting look into the bison topic:
Posts 33 and 35
 
I agree in some respects. I've heard that the Timney triggers require constant maintenance in the field. Like a lot of things they are great at the range but not so great in the field. Just an example of what is considered top quality yet won't perform.
I’ve only had 2 custom rifles built (.30-06 & .375 H&H) both times a Jewel trigger was recommended over the Timney. Once, the existing Sako trigger was recommended as a viable option because it was 3 lbs. and especially crisp & consistent. I’ve never heard anything bad about the Timney but they may not be considered top tier.
 
Yeah as someone with a Minor in Wildlife Biology, I always cringe when I hear that there were 60 million buffalo back then. Total made-up BS to make the white man European look even worse. Probably was 1/5th of that claim.
Not sure how to resolve that discrepancy but even if “only” 10mil (concentrated West of Mississippi) - that’s a hell of a lot of buffalo to lose in 30-40 years. But the point was only made to illustrate the effectiveness of rifles accuracy & killing power even 150 years ago - no scopes, range finders, sub MOA, and velocities under 2000 fps....
 
It all depends on what the intended application… and the platform can be a factor as well..

Jewel makes an incredible trigger for a Rem 700 for example..

But I’d challenge anyone to find anything better than a Giessele for an AR…

People will always have their preferences… is a Bugatti really a “better” super car than a McLaren?

It just depends on who you ask…
 
I’ve only had 2 custom rifles built (.30-06 & .375 H&H) both times a Jewel trigger was recommended over the Timney. Once, the existing Sako trigger was recommended as a viable option because it was 3 lbs. and especially crisp & consistent. I’ve never heard anything bad about the Timney but they may not be considered top tier.
My friend is a real gun guru and on a recent hunt to AK he had to bring lighter fluid and long qtips to clean the Timney trigger regularly. One thing about the R8 is the trigger is fantastic right out of the box!
 
My friend is a real gun guru and on a recent hunt to AK he had to bring lighter fluid and long qtips to clean the Timney trigger regularly. One thing about the R8 is the trigger is fantastic right out of the box!
SO he had to light the Timney trigger on fire? (just kidding)... I know that for some very cold weather the oil/lubricant in the rifle trigger & firing pin can freeze up and cause problems. An alternative is to use a dry lube, graphite etc.. Was it the cold weather that caused the need to clean trigger with lighter fluid or just he needs to repeatedly clean that Timney trigger on any hunt?
 
My friend is a real gun guru and on a recent hunt to AK he had to bring lighter fluid and long qtips to clean the Timney trigger regularly.

@Philip Glass as much as I enjoy your videos, I have to call you out on this.

What you described is a problem with the lubrication stiffening/freezing in a cold environment.
Chances are that your gun guru friend contributed to the problem during gun cleaning.

Further, you cite one "data point" of poor performance of a mechanical device with an otherwise solid history of stellar performance. Statistically one data point is nearly meaningless. Ten is the smallest "sample set" used for a meaningful evaluation. A set of fifty is much, much better.

@HankBuck provided a cold environment lubricant a moment ago. Graphite has been a recommend lubricant for cold environments for at least 50 years. At least that's when I read about its use in Guns and Ammo or was it Shooting Times?
 
Last edited:
Shooting a 1" group on a range doesn't mean much IMO. Mega scope, tripod/rests, solid position, good weather, plenty of time to take the shot, etc. All it proves is that when conditions are PERFECT the rifle is capable of excellent accuracy. But what happens when things aren't that controlled. Low light, unknown distance, lousy position, little time to make the shot, cruddy weather, wandering target, etc.

Hunters should spend more time practicing placing accurate shots under hunting conditions than printing pretty groups under range conditions. Yes, proving the gun can shoot is important but once that's done it's time to prove the hunter can shoot as well as the rifle. I've helped friends track enough wounded deer to know that an accurate rifle is only a small part of the equation. I've had to track a few of my own that were shot with rifles of known accuracy. The fact a rifle can shoot sub MOA is of no value if the hunter can't shoot well under hunting conditions. It might as well be a 3MOA rifle for all the difference it makes if the hunter can't shoot unless he's on a bench.
 
I’ve only had 2 custom rifles built (.30-06 & .375 H&H) both times a Jewel trigger was recommended over the Timney. Once, the existing Sako trigger was recommended as a viable option because it was 3 lbs. and especially crisp & consistent. I’ve never heard anything bad about the Timney but they may not be considered top tier.

I've got rifles with Jewel, Timney, sako, and many factory triggers including those on factory Tikkas. I've been hunting big game since 1971, and guided hunters for deer, antelope, aoudad, hogs for over 16 years in dry, dusty, sandy, West TX, E NM, and the TX Panhandle. I never had a trigger of any make go south, fail to fire, etc. Almost without exception, it is/was, hunter/user error when there were feeding or extraction problems and can't recall a single trigger issue, ever.

I stick to my original response..... I fail to understand why anyone would care if a fellow hunter uses a $500 Tikka or a $5000 McWhorter custom. I"d be much more concerned with the hunter knowing what he's doing with what he's got.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
58,330
Messages
1,257,792
Members
104,486
Latest member
AnthonyPri
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

Updated available dates for 2025

14-20 March
1-11 April
16-27 April
12-24 May
6-30 June
25-31 July
august September and October is wide open!
Badboymelvin wrote on BlueFlyer's profile.
Hey mate,
How are you?
Have really enjoyed reading your thread on the 416WSM... really good stuff!
Hey, I noticed that you were at the SSAA Eagle Park range... where about in Australia are you?
Just asking because l'm based in Geelong and l frequent Eagle Park a bit too.
Next time your down, let me know if you want to catch up and say hi (y)
Take care bud
Russ
Hyde Hunter wrote on MissingAfrica's profile.
may I suggest Intaba Safaris in the East Cape by Port Elizabeth, Eugene is a great guy, 2 of us will be there April 6th to April 14th. he does cull hunts(that's what I am doing) and if you go to his web site he is and offering daily fees of 200.00 and good cull prices. Thanks Jim
Everyone always thinks about the worst thing that can happen, maybe ask yourself what's the best outcome that could happen?
Very inquisitive warthogs
faa538b2-dd82-4f5c-ba13-e50688c53d55.jpeg
c0583067-e4e9-442b-b084-04c7b7651182.jpeg
 
Top