geoff rath
AH elite
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2017
- Messages
- 1,569
- Reaction score
- 2,442
ExactlyWhy?....
ExactlyWhy?....
I've heard of a 416Rigby Rimmed, from British Maker ...I know something about a British maker developing some new rounds. And thats all im saying
Huge range available, compared to what we could get in Afrika, or Australia ...Not sure where you are looking but looks like 416 Rigby is available $120-$130 per box hornady or barnes. 416 ruger $40 cheaper.
View attachment 525586View attachment 525587
Interesting take regarding the .458 WM. I would have thought that would be one of the higher volume sellers, especially in the American market given the price point and Winchester name.I’m 71 years old. When I was a kid, dangerous game calibers referred mostly to the old British classics. Germany had the 9.3x62mm Mauser, the 9.3x64mm Brenneke and the 10.75x68mm Mauser (not counting the already obsolete 11.2x72mm Schuler or the .500 Jeffery). Austria had the 9.5x57mm Mannlicher Schoenauer (which was dismal for hunting dangerous game). America had the .405 Winchester (which was considered an obsolete caliber back then). But barring that, everything else was British.
Then, Kynoch (the only company who was producing ammunition for the British dangerous game calibers except the .375 Holland & Holland Magnum) began to slowly scale down ammunition production in the 1950s (when Great Britain began losing it’s colonies where dangerous game could be hunted) before completely closing shop in 1972. This caused American firearms manufacturers to bring out 3 new dangerous game calibers during this time.
They were:
.458 Winchester Magnum
.378 Weatherby Magnum
.460 Weatherby Magnum
Each of them came with their own set of problems (which are well documented).
Later (in the 1980s and 1990s), came a few others.
A Square came out with their proprietary calibers:
.375 A Square
.460 A Square Short
.470 Capstick
.495 A Square
.500 A Square
.577 Tyrannosaur
None of these lasted very long in terms of popularity. And today, they’ve almost completely vanished from the face of the earth.
Remington came out with 2:
.375 Remington Ultra Mag
.416 Remington Magnum
Ruger came out with 2:
.375 Ruger
.416 Ruger
Holland & Holland came out with 2:
.400 Holland & Holland Magnum
.465 Holland & Holland Magnum
Kreighoff came out with the .500/416 Nitro Express.
Sako came out with the .370 Sako Magnum.
John Rigby & Co. came out with the .450 Rigby.
Jack Lott developed the .458 Lott.
Harald Wolf developed a version of the .500 Jeffery without the rebated rim (while his innovation never caught on, it almost singlehandedly brought back the .500 Jeffery from the dead and lead to it becoming a popular caliber again).
Ross Seyfried developed the .585 Nyati.
So, yes. I’ve seen A LOT of new dangerous game calibers hit the market during my time. But to me, all of them seemed as if they were trying to reinvent the wheel.
Today, the only ones which have retained popularity are:
.375 Ruger
.416 Ruger
.416 Remington Magnum
.500/416 Nitro Express
.450 Rigby
.458 Lott
The .458 Winchester Magnum was popular for a time (1957-early 1980s). But only because it was (at the time) the only dangerous game caliber for which factory loaded ammonium was commercially available.
Barring this, most people in our line of interest opt for the traditional British Nitro Express calibers. The reason is simple:
”If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”
In regards to the .458 Winchester Magnum, it was initially met with very positive reception. Then, the case capacity problems (which resulted in either low velocities or compressed charges with poor shelf life) came to light by the early 1970s.Interesting take regarding the .458 WM. I would have thought that would be one of the higher volume sellers, especially in the American market given the price point and Winchester name.
Do you believe we are beyond the days of new DG cartridges coming to market?
Is there any gap you see where a manufacturer could fulfil by reinventing a new cartridge?
We already have both Magnum and standard length offerings for:
1. 375H&H - 375 Ruger
2. 416 Rigby - 416 Ruger
3. 458 Lott - 458 WM
4. 505 Gibbs - 500 Jeffery.
The 500 is the only one I can think of that hasn't had a modern standard length action rendition since the 1920s with the 500 Jeffery. Maybe there is opportunity here for someone to a modern 500?
I can't see any further evolution happening to the Nitro Express family of cartridges.
The 495 A Square fits into that category as well correct? There’s the 500 MDM as well.In regards to the .458 Winchester Magnum, it was initially met with very positive reception. Then, the case capacity problems (which resulted in either low velocities or compressed charges with poor shelf life) came to light by the early 1970s.
I believe that instead of designing new calibers, manufacturers should rather think of producing more rifles and ammunition offerings in EXISTING calibers. As it is, every year… options keep getting more and more limited.
Regarding the .500, there was the .500 A Square and the .500 Jeffery. Both of which can be built on standard length actions. A close friend of mine in Australia owns a .500 Jeffery which was very affordably built on a Zastava Model 70 action. The .500 Jeffery can be loaded with 570Gr bullets (same weight as those used by the .500 Nitro Express) and pushed to 2350 fps (which is 200 fps faster than the .500 Nitro Express).
Aren't 350grain projectiles already available for 375? I know it's not offered in Hornadys factory loadings for 375Ruger but I've seen them with 375H&H.How about a 400Ruger?
350 gn at .400.
SD would be .313.
Harder hit than a 375R.
Better velocity and flatter trajectory than .416R.
Would need to develope bullets.
Fits in existing Ruger rifles.
Market as an Alaskan Rifle to handle big bears.
Stopping calibers begin with a "4".
Stopping calibers begin at .458How about a 400Ruger?
350 gn at .400.
SD would be .313.
Harder hit than a 375R.
Better velocity and flatter trajectory than .416R.
Would need to develope bullets.
Fits in existing Ruger rifles.
Could use 10mm pistol bullets for plinking.
Market as an Alaskan Rifle to handle big bears.
Stopping calibers begin with a "4".
I think you echo the general consensus here that the market doesn't need any further new DG cartridges, that all gaps have been covered and that we just need increased production of the existing cartridges and rifles.I see no need for new big bore cartridges.
We already have far too many on the market so it is becoming increasingly difficult to choose one or the other. The only positive thing about it, is that there are enough cartridges for all preferences. @Hunter-Habib has listed well the cartridges, I only regret that in addition to the more or less newer cartridges from US-development, the cartridge 460 WBY-Magnum unfortunately could not prevail. Weatherby there made some mistakes in marketing.
One also have to take into account that the majority of hunters have problems with such cartridges, and that is why the trend nowadays is going more and more in the direction of smaller bore cartridges for hunting Big Game. It all started decades ago when the minimum caliber of 10mm for DG was reduced to .375, mainly to have enough clients. I therefore find it difficult how anyone wants to enter the market with new Big Bores.
I have a feeling that Ruger will only focus on their 375/416 Ruger cartridges and even still, they barely produce those.Most of this is just a rehash of what others have said but due to the limited customer base, IMO, the DG bases are covered. We do need ammo and components to be made more available.
There is one aspect of DG rifles I would like to see reversed: CZ no longer makes the 550. Ruger no longer produces the #1 in DG chamberings. Kimber dropped the .416 Rigby and .458 Lott chamberings in the Caprivi. The CZ is probably a done deal, but I’d like to see the others make at least limited annual runs, maybe a chambering a year.
Woodleigh produce 350 grain 375 cal bullets, Round Nose, with an SD of .323, in a special Heavy Duty format. Hopefully back on the market soon..Aren't 350grain projectiles already available for 375? I know it's not offered in Hornadys factory loadings for 375Ruger but I've seen them with 375H&H.
A 350 grain 375 would have an even higher sectional density of .356.