That statement is laughable at best. A majority or minority leader work for all us, and answer to all of us, and not just a caucus, constituency, or the status quo.
No one has more experience maximizing the power of a Senate minority?......LOL
McConnell couldn't organize Jack shit when he was majority leader......and Jack left town.
Weak leadership is the direct result of our current state of political affairs.
Laughable? Really? Well let's look at each of your assertions.
The constitution, as amended, establishes that a senator is elected by his or her constituents in his or her state. The senator works for them. Ethically, he works for the country - but he only answers to his constituents. That means McConnell does not work for you or any other voter outside of Kentucky. As a matter of fact, as a Arizonan, you technically have no one in the senate that represents your particular political grievances directly. You might want to consider that as a focus of your ire.
Majority and minority leader are elected by the party conferences of the senate. Back to the first point, from a Republican party senate conference perspective, no one really cares what Arizona thinks at the moment with respect to whom the minority leadership is given.
The senate minority leader has a great deal of power - not as much as the majority leader - but, nevertheless, considerable political power and influence. McConnel has, throughout his leadership career, been a pragmatist. Bellowing in rage about issues that either can't be fixed or are not worth the political capital of fixing them is alien to his, and frankly the senate's, critical path for getting things done. He is an expert at it. His peers recognize him as such.
McConnel, not the flim flam man from New York, gave us the most conservative court in a hundred years. That is a remarkable accomplishment that will long outlive the chaos brought about by Donald Trump. Pretty good for ole Jack.
With respect to minority leadership and its role, over the last 100 years the republican party has held both houses for only twenty. For twelve years, McConnel has navigated both majority and minority leadership. No one has a better handle on it and that is why his conference voted him the leadership role 37 to 10 over Rick Scott.
He is anything but a weak leader. Because he knows how to use his influence and work the legislative system, he actually gets things done. Indeed, other than executive orders, Trump was dependent upon McConnel to get anything through the senate. Again, SCOTUS nominees were the most publicly noteworthy.