Brent in Az
AH ambassador
I'm not sure this is a valid comparison. Two issues- It would be nice if there was no previous conflict of interest due to all of the financial arrangements between Bidet and Ukraine/Russia. Secondly, I don't see documentation regarding what would be AID- that is something given without expectation of return and equipment transferred as part of a sale. Is the money going to Maui AID or LOANS?
Send him to the front lines of the war and see how great he thinks it is!If anyone doubts the power of propaganda..........
...
The senate minority leader has a great deal of power - not as much as the majority leader - but, nevertheless, considerable political power and influence. McConnel has, throughout his leadership career, been a pragmatist. Bellowing in rage about issues that either can't be fixed or are not worth the political capital of fixing them is alien to his, and frankly the senate's, critical path for getting things done. He is an expert at it. His peers recognize him as such.
McConnel, not the flim flam man from New York, gave us the most conservative court in a hundred years. That is a remarkable accomplishment that will long outlive the chaos brought about by Donald Trump. Pretty good for ole Jack.
With respect to minority leadership and its role, over the last 100 years the republican party has held both houses for only twenty. For twelve years, McConnel has navigated both majority and minority leadership. No one has a better handle on it and that is why his conference voted him the leadership role 37 to 10 over Rick Scott.
He is anything but a weak leader. Because he knows how to use his influence and work the legislative system, he actually gets things done. Indeed, other than executive orders, Trump was dependent upon McConnel to get anything through the senate. Again, SCOTUS nominees were the most publicly noteworthy.
I am wondering whether Ukraine’s news blackout is in fact not shooting themselves in the foot? The Russians surely know where the attacks are, they are happening to them! And if they were not in the picture, just read the bloggers covering it from the Russian perspective. But what of the Ukrainian perspective? It is all a big secret and that is hardly keeping anyone’s interest. If there is something positive to say why not say it?
I am wondering whether Ukraine’s news blackout is in fact not shooting themselves in the foot? The Russians surely know where the attacks are, they are happening to them! And if they were not in the picture, just read the bloggers covering it from the Russian perspective. But what of the Ukrainian perspective? It is all a big secret and that is hardly keeping anyone’s interest. If there is something positive to say why not say it?
The problem with brinkmanship is the brink. It seems to me that somebody better get that call to the negotiating table ready, because once the land bridge is threatened it is a huge deal for both sides. This war needs to end, it was a miscalculation at the beginning and it could be another if it goes too far.I have a feeling the Ukranians are doing their best not to humiliate Putin with news. Putin still has tactical nukes and there is a possibility that he might use them if the choice comes to losing power (and life of course) and using nukes.
The problem with brinkmanship is the brink. It seems to me that somebody better get that call to the negotiating table ready, because once the land bridge is threatened it is a huge deal for both sides. This war needs to end, it was a miscalculation at the beginning and it could be another if it goes too far.
I have a feeling the Ukranians are doing their best not to humiliate Putin with news. Putin still has tactical nukes and there is a possibility that he might use them if the choice comes to losing power (and life of course) and using nukes.
The answer to negotiations between Ukraine and Russia lays with China. At present China could help Russia see the benefits of withdrawing from its endeavors. but China has endeavors of its own to pursue and an open window of opportunity that could close in a year. So China may see advantage to allowing Russia to continue the war, even to escalate it, so that at some point China could jump in and pick up the pieces of the western world.
Could not disagree with you more Kevin. Russia is desperately counting on the West to do just what you suggest. To be blunt, Russia needs to loose this war. I suppose Putin could decide to commit personal, national, and cultural suicide through nuclear weapons, but I doubt it.The problem with brinkmanship is the brink. It seems to me that somebody better get that call to the negotiating table ready, because once the land bridge is threatened it is a huge deal for both sides. This war needs to end, it was a miscalculation at the beginning and it could be another if it goes too far.
I just don’t see what there is to negotiate. How can we possibly expect Ukraine to give up territory that was illegally seized from them? They hold all the cards at this point. Russian defenses appear brittle, Ukraine my sever their connection to Ukraine before the mud. If they then take out the bridge, the Russians are in for a long winter. Russia can’t admit weakness or defeat, Ukraine won’t give up their claim to illegally seized territory. Where is the negotiated solution?