We are waiting as well we are booked for the 1st of August.I'm still waiting to get an official answer, tomorrow is 30 days from wheels up for me as long as this doesn't screw it up, so I am definitely keeping up with it. I will let you all know as soon as I hear something concrete.
Maybe Martin can provide an update?
Agreed. It’s been 2 months since the initial post and no updates. @MARTIN PIETERS SAFARIS are you able share any info on how things are progressing with the resolution of this issue?Any resolution to this? Been a while...
One would think there has been adequate time to provide a simple update or clarification but apparently not.Agreed. It’s been 2 months since the initial post and no updates. @MARTIN PIETERS SAFARIS are you able share any info on how things are progressing with the resolution of this issue?
Would that be in the Omay South which D&Y also has and is not addressed in this thread?I know current D&Y group is at a different concession
Maybe Martin can provide an update?
Any resolution to this? Been a while...
Wouldn’t the burden of proof be the responsibility of those saying Martin DIDNT get the concession?Agreed. It’s been 2 months since the initial post and no updates. @MARTIN PIETERS SAFARIS are you able share any info on how things are progressing with the resolution of this issue?
Would that be in the Omay South which D&Y also has and is not addressed in this thread?
Yes they are.No. The current D&Y group is further east on a different concession. Seems they are doing well though
One would think there has been adequate time to provide a simple update or clarification but apparently not.
Burden of proof? This isn’t a court of law. Simply multiple polite inquiries if there is any additional info available. After all, Martin is the one who posted this originally and he is the AH Sponsor/Member. It doesn’t seem out of line to inquire. And as of yet I don’t see anyone casting shade.Wouldn’t the burden of proof be the responsibility of those saying Martin DIDNT get the concession?
You’re right it’s not the court of law, but you seem to be questioning the legitimacy of the acquisition when you ask if there’s been any resolution. From what I’ve read, no one on the ground has claimed that this wasn’t legit. Maybe you have some inside info, but to me, by Martin posting that they are the new concession holders, nothing needs to be updated or resolved.Burden of proof? This isn’t a court of law. Simply multiple polite inquiries if there is any additional info available. After all, Martin is the one who posted this originally and he is the AH Sponsor/Member. It doesn’t seem out of line to inquire. And as of yet I don’t see anyone casting shade.
I believe if you go back to the beginning of this thread and read through from the start, you will see multiple members’ posts that raise questions about what’s going on. None of which are mine by the way. I have not questioned the legitimacy of anything. Simply one of several people who are asking if additional light can be shed on the situation. And I‘m actually attempting to go straight to the source who might have the most accurate and up to date info, Martin Pieters. If that in some way seems to be questioning the legitimacy of anything I’m not sure what more to say?You’re right it’s not the court of law, but you seem to be questioning the legitimacy of the acquisition when you ask if there’s been any resolution. From what I’ve read, no one on the ground has claimed that this wasn’t legit. Maybe you have some inside info, but to me, by Martin posting that they are the new concession holders, nothing needs to be updated or resolved.
But like I said, I don’t have any inside info on Zim. If you do, maybe you can post it to help hunters hoping to hunt this area do their DD, so they don’t get burnt.
If you look at my original comment, you’ll see I quoted three members. I could have gotten more, but they were all grouped together nicely to make it easy. You responded back, so yes, I cherry picked your comment, but in no way am I singling you out.I believe if you go back to the beginning of this thread and read through from the start, you will see multiple members’ posts that raise questions about what’s going on. None of which are mine by the way. I have not questioned the legitimacy of anything. Simply one of several people who are asking if additional light can be shed on the situation. And I‘m actually attempting to go straight to the source who might have the most accurate and up to date info, Martin Pieters. If that in some way seems to be questioning the legitimacy of anything I’m not sure what more to say?
Again, read all posts through from the start and I believe you may come away with a different perception.
Thanks
Dan