@Killo and
@Agrarler to translate from foreigner internet speak.
You have to remember, there are two, and really only two amazing conservation models that have worked in the history of man. Model 1 is the American model founded by our president Teddy Roosevelt. It was called the "public trust wildlife doctrine" wherein the Americans decided our "crown jewels" were our natural resources. In America, the public owns in trust our wildlife and its held for their benefit with an organized off-take paid for by those that pay for licenses. The other is the Republic of South Africa that started with an extinct, desolate country and privatized land and allowed them to own anything fenced in by their property. From desolation in South Africa sprung private enterprise that saved hundreds of species of game by assigning them a private cash value.
Zimbabwe (formerly Southern Rhodesia) decided on the American model wherein their crown jewels belonged to the people. Thus, you pay for quota payable to the State or tribe and you pay a daily rate to the Operator and Professional Hunter. The result has been that their resources have been wisely managed. The negative in Zimbabwe is that there is not enough profit in wildlife to justify vast marketing dollars to invite you to hunt their wildlife sustainably. You will meet very few Zimbabwean professional hunters and guides at your regional hunting exhibitions because they lack the means to offer free hunts or deep discounts on game in exchange for marketing dollars to do conventions. They lack the financial resources to advertise to the extent that our friends in RSA can do with their private ownership of wildlife model. It doesn't make them lesser, it only means they lack the financial means to advertise.
Too long, didn't read. The USA's wildlife model is wonderful. So is RSAs. So is Zimbabwes. You just need to understand why some groups cannot donate and advertise their offerings to the same financial level as one another.