Hank2211
AH legend
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2010
- Messages
- 3,289
- Reaction score
- 9,081
- Media
- 216
- Articles
- 4
- Member of
- SCI, DU, Pheasants Forever
- Hunted
- Canada, United States, Zimbabwe, South Africa (Eastern Cape; Northern Cape; North West Province, Natal, Mpumalanga, Limpopo), Namibia, Cameroon, Benin, Ethiopia, Liberia, Mozambique, Argentina
I was raised the same way, and I expect most North Americans of my generation (old bu not that old) were raised the same way.I really hate hunting female animals. That was just how I was raised.
But let me suggest something here. We expect antis and animal rights types too get past their emotions and focus on the science. And rightfully so.
Well, science has made it pretty clear that there are times when it makes sense to take females instead of males. Take deer in North America. We are so squeamish we call female deer "antlerless deer," and we have seasons on them in an effort to keep excessive populations down. I have heard (but can't prove) that in some jurisdictions, if you want a male tag, you need to take a female first. In Africa, we always used to look for the stallion in any zebra herd, and take him out. Well, science is showing that that may not be the best long term strategy, and that it is often better to take out a female. When taking animals for bait, should we take trophy animals, or young males, which haven't had a chance to pass on their genes? Likely not.
My point, with the greatest of respect, is that we, too, have to get past our emotions when it comes to the decisions we make in terms of hunting. Or stop being critical of others for making their decisions based on emotion.
An animal is an animal is an animal.