Why not both? Consider this:
You and a bunch of others book an amazing deal with a new on the scene outfitter. The hunters go on their trip, see some animals but not many. You take a few okay trophies, but nothing spectacular, and some of your animals that your PH said to shoot are obviously sub adults.
Hunting vehicles are in a state of relative disrepair, so you spend many hours waiting on a broken truck to be repaired.
Food at best is marginal in quality and always just a bit on the short side.
Your PH always seems a bit slow to get going in the morning, midday break seems to be a bit longer than necessary, and you're always headed back to the camp/lodge well before dark, and it's always a pretty short drive back.
Camp staff while maybe not rude to you seem a bit unhappy. You can't quite put your finger on it, but you can feel the tension, something's wrong here.
You decide to have a couple of your better but average at best animals sent in to the taxidermist your outfitter works with. After being home for a few months and not hearing from the taxidermist, you decide to shoot them an email or call them. The taxidermist regrets to inform you that no progress has been made on your trophies, because your outfitter has not provided them to him. You do some more digging because your outfitter is now hard to reach. You find out that the landowner of the property you hunted on has locked up your trophies, because he has not been paid his portion of the trophy fees.
You now start to surf the web and find out that others who took up this amazing deal are reporting the same problems. Everyone stays calm for a little while in an effort to get the situation resolved, but it does not end well. Pissed off and rightfully so, you form the quintessential rant of all "I got screwed" rants, eloquent, based on facts.....the perfect bad hunt report and you post it here on AH and perhaps other places too. It ends with "I will never hunt Africa again!"
Sometime not long after you hit the submit button, you remember there was that one well known outfitter who when you asked for information regarding the guy you booked with, he warned you that this may not be the deal you thought it was. But at least you had something of a hunt, you hopefully have some pictures and some good memories even if you don't have your trophies. Even so, this truly once in a lifetime hunt should have been better. Waiting another year to save up a bit more would have been the better choice however and you now realize this.
But that experienced outfitter who warned you, well he now has to live with your bad report. Not because it was about him, but it was about the country he operates in. So then he has to live with the overall fallout that many people may read your report may decide that Africa is not for them.
So in the end both of you lose.
The situation I came up with is based off what I have read in numerous bad reports. Is it indicative of all aggressively priced deals? No, but it happens and it's not good for anyone.
Yes, the situation you came up with is based on reading numerous reports.
Most likely similar and the same as I have read.
But I have read plenty of bad reports on high end priced hunts/day rates too.
And I have talked with plenty of hunters that have been on hunts in South Africa paying $450 and higher in daily rates and many have felt scammed when coming home.
The day rates really tells nothing or little of the quality of the experience.
Most Norwegian hunters go to hunt in South Africa or Namibia by booking a hunt with a more or less serious Norwegian or Danish "agent" where most of the time, the price is not at a bargain rate at all.
And their experiences varies a lot.
I am totally sure that hunting with Jaco would be a great experience, but I am sure I will have a great experience hunting with others for a lower day rate too.
Others will clearly find that they get a greater experience hunting with Jaco, but that all depends on what we want and are looking for.
On my first hunt in South Africa, I hunted with an outfitter that charged $400 in day rates and I booked the package from a well known agent that is also known as being very serious.
Even if I had a great time hunting, and it made me want to go back to South Africa to hunt again, I clearly think that I didn't get what I paid for.
How can we really know if we will get what we pay for or not?
How can we know if the more expensive offer will be better than the cheaper one?
We really can't.
I have enough experience in the construction business to very well know that the price very often do not mirror the quality.
Even if the outfitter business is very different from the construction business, I think it very often is like that there too.
We can do our best to read forums like this, ask the right questions and gather as much knowledge as possible, but still we take a chance with our hard earned money.
And still we might get disappointed.
I think being a member of this forum, reading a lot on it and get a gut feeling about the different outfitters here over some time, very often will help people make the right choice.
And I really think that people booking a hunt with most of the outfitters being members on this forum will get a great experience.
As said in a earlier post, is my family of 6 planning to go to South Africa to hunt a few years from now.
At a day rate of $400-450 or higher per person + trophy fees, we can not afford this.
Even if we save up a few/many more years.
Then our kids will for sure have left the nest and we have missed the chance to give them the great experience hunting in Africa can be when they still live with us.
So our choice is either not to go or we will need to risk it with an outfitter charging lower day rates or gives us a great deal.
So I hope that some of the outfitters offering lower prices on this forum are still running their business and getting great reviews till the day it is time for us to book our hunt.
If not, we better spend our money hunting somewhere else in the world.