416 Rigby vs 458 WinMag a civil discussion

This is great info! I hope others can shed more light! Thank you!!!

Yes he did as most in that era did, the 416 Rigby was almost unheard of and the 458WinMag didn’t exist for much of his hunting career.
But when the 458 came out he fully endorsed it!

Just curious, are you asking about the 458Win or is there a 458 B&M?
There has been a lot of research done on the 416 B&M and 458 B&M. Probably more done on the 416 and 458 in modern projectiles side by side than any if the large manufactures in both test media and in field.

Michael's testing over the years is likely one of the best resources for 416 vs 458 projectiles albeit not 416 Rigby vs 458 Win
 
Now the 416 Rigby and the 458 WinMag are very close in energy but the 458 has better SD, better momentum, and a larger meplat…
How is this statement made with no mention of bullet weight or velocity? Are you talking about factory loadings of 400 grains in 416 and 500 grains in 458? There are also many factors of bullet shape/design that contribute to the answer.
 
How is this statement made with no mention of bullet weight or velocity? Are you talking about factory loadings of 400 grains in 416 and 500 grains in 458? There are also many factors of bullet shape/design that contribute to the answer.
You are right, I should have included that, my mistake. I guess I just assumed that everyone would take it as the standard for each, 400gr at 2400ftps for the 416 and 500gr at 2150 for the 458. Apologies for not stating that…
And yes there are many bullet designs and shapes but both are so common that the offerings should be the same for both. Again I assumed that everyone would think shooting the same bullets as in both shooting the Hornady DGS or Custom CEB or whatever…
 
There has been a lot of research done on the 416 B&M and 458 B&M. Probably more done on the 416 and 458 in modern projectiles side by side than any if the large manufactures in both test media and in field.

Michael's testing over the years is likely one of the best resources for 416 vs 458 projectiles albeit not 416 Rigby vs 458 Win
I hope he chimes in!
 
Interesting to know which has better penetration, the common thought is the .416 400gr out of the main .416s was superior to .458Win with .500gr but I suspect not the .450Rigby or Weatherby ?

I have had old factory Winchester.458Win White box 500gr or 510gr solid go in the Ass & exit out the nose of a wounded fleeing Buffalo, I was a little surprised at that myself & snapped a couple of photos.

Could only be my.458Win as hunter was using .338Rem Ultra Mag !
 
Hey!!! My thread on indecision between the 416 Rem and 458 Lott was civil. Just sayin'......... :cool:

I think that @Mark A Ouellette nails it. The reason that both theory and experience favor the 416/400 at 2400 fps for penetration is because the smaller frontal area requires less force to penetrate vs the larger calibers. Even though the 458/500 has a higher SD, the SD isn't high enough with a 500 grainer at 2150 fps to overcome the lesser resistance and momentum of the 416/400.

Remember, PO Ackley showed us that a 40 grain bullet from a 220 Swift would punch a hole in armor plating where a 168 grain 30-06 armor piercing round would not.

What I want to know is if a 458/500 at 2300 fps will out penetrate a 416/400 at 2400 fps. With well designed solids, the penetration should increase with velocity, at least to a point. I don't know what that point is. I would think that that given the proper velocity, and 458/500 would out penetrate a 416/400. But I don't know.

I do remember hearing about how the 460 Wby shooting a 500 grainer at 2700 for had poor penetration, but that could have been due to poor bullet design back in the day.
 
The SD does not only play a role in the depth of penetration of a bullet. Other parameters are also important, especially the impact velocity. In our case the bullet design and the SD of the bullets can be seen as fairly comparable. For this reason the impact velocity will make the difference and the cartridge 416 Rigby offers more velocity than the cartridge 458 Winchester Magnum.

The cartridge 460 Weatherby Magnum is ahead of the cartridge 416 Rigby when it comes to all of this. Penetration can be, due to a high impact velocity, sometime not as good by using old classic SP bullets, but there is a great shock effect that compensates for a lot.
 
I think Michael.458 favors the .458 with a 400 grain CEB
@michael458 would be the one to confirm here.

I believe I have seen data on the 416 B&M going 60+ inches of penetration and the 458 getting 40+. That said, I'm sure he has done tests on the dame media and can offer more controlled results.


The Origin ...........

So it’s interesting to me to hear some here say that the 416 will out penetrate the 458?

OK, so far, this thread leaves much to be desired....... I assume we are talking about solids.......I see SD (Sectional Density) mentioned several times...... but I see little about bullet design and other 7 Factors of Solid Terminal Performance. Just to make a statement that 416 out penetrates 458 is so broad that it is basically meaningless, sorry...... How many different designs of Solids are out there? How many different Nose Profile designs? Meplat Sizes? And much more.........My Apologies up front, but this is not going to be a "short answer", not if you really wish to understand the dynamics involved. If I merely state to you, that it is false that 416 out penetrates 458, then you are going to want to know why, correct? If I say, yes, it will out penetrate 458, then the 458 people are going to want to know, Why? Correct?........... So lets dive in, and find out WHY..............

But First, you are going have to read and understand the 8 Known Factors of Solid Terminal Performance;

There are 8 Absolute Known Factors for Solid Penetration and are as follows in Order of Importance.....

#1 Meplat Percentage of Caliber

Meplats that attain 65% Meplat of Caliber are terminally stable.... Above 70% Meplat bullets remain stable, however depth of penetration begins to decrease with every step up in meplat size. 70% Meplat or larger does increase trauma to, and destruction of tissue. 70% Meplats start to get difficult to feed, even in Winchester M70s...... From 65% Meplat to 68% Meplat is OPTIMUM for Stability, destruction of tissues, and feed and function in most quality rifles..........

#2 Nose Profile
There are many and varied Nose Profiles of solids on the market today, from the angled Nose Profiles of CEB and North Fork, to the straight nose profile of the older North Forks and GSC, the Barnes/Hornady Profiles (like a RN cut off at the top) to many more... Not all of these are created equal, and some are better performers than others. In recent tests in comparison between the old North Fork Profiles and the Newer North Fork Profiles I was getting 20% deeper penetration with the Newer North Forks than the older, with the same bullet, just difference in Nose Profile is all.... John at North Fork agrees, and in their work there they were getting more along the lines of 25% deeper penetration. One major thing that I noticed here, the stability at the end of penetration was 100% better. In most all tests here the last 2 inches of penetration of the old style North Forks would be unstable. Now this is and was of no consequence at the very end of penetration. The depth of penetration of these older nose profile bullets was always so deep that it had long accomplished its mission before loss of stability right at the very end. This new NOSE PROFILE of North Forks remains DEAD STRAIGHT to the very last of penetration, and always found NOSE FORWARD........

#3 Construction & Material
Construction of a solid is a major part of its ability to penetrate. To deny this is foolish to say the least. Some of our solids out there, lead core, are very very weak in construction and absolutely do not have the ability to bust through heavy bone and reach their intended targets. I have seen and have in hand failures of these bullets from the field..... A shame as well, as some of these bullets are promoted as Dangerous Game Solids, and some of them flatten out like pancakes when hitting heavy dense material. Some FMJ Have steel inserts, while this solves a problem in one area, it creates problems in other areas.... Brass is harder than Copper... No surprise there, but I have busted elephant heads with both copper and brass, and never had one distort, but, these solids were of a very STRONG NOSE PROFILE as well........ So you see, combinations of different factors work together to strengthen or weaken other factors..... A good strong Nose Profile, can overcome some material deficiencies and in the case of copper solids this is extremely important.

#4 Nose Projection
Nose Projection above the top bands was the last factor discovered. There may be more factors, but currently they remain undiscovered at this point in time.... We found that nose projection above the top of the bands of current CNC monolithic bullets is very important to depth of penetration. Some bullets designed to work through lever actin riflers require a SHORT NOSE PROJECTION in front of the bands so that they can be loaded deep enough to work through the actions of these guns... Nose Projection of these same bullets for bolt guns, single shots, and double rifles are longer, from .600 to .700 in front of the top band. The LONGER NOSE PROJECTION solids will penetrate on average 25% deeper than the shorter nose projection. Now, these bullets already have all the other required factors for stability, nose profile, construction and radius, so it is ONLY DEPTH Of penetration that is effected with properly designed bullets.


#5 Radius Edge of Meplat
We found that the radius edge of the meplat made a difference, small, but a difference none the less. A nicely radius edge penetrates about 5% deeper, and has more stability at the end than a sharp edged radius.... No more to go into here, thats it.......


All the Above Factors Deal with Bullet Design........



#6 Velocity

Velocity is a factor, but it also goes hand in hand with Nose Profile and Construction/Material. If we assume that the Meplat is optimum, the nose projection is optimum, and the bullet has a nice radius then velocity becomes a factor in combination with nose profile and construction/materials. Different Nose Profiles react differently with velocity. Some nose profiles at very low velocity cannot maintain stability, but this would be in the extreme, and other factors may come into play with some of this. In essence with some Nose Profiles, added velocity will equate to added depth of penetration, and of course trauma and destruction of tissue. Some nose profiles react better than others, but if properly designed, then all will get some gain from added velocity, UNTIL you reach the point that you get distortion of the meplat by TOO MUCH VELOCITY. Once you begin to distort that meplat, then all sorts of strange things begin to occur. One is depth of penetration will decrease, stability will decrease as well....... Normally you will only get this at extreme velocities at 2700-2800 fps or more, which in our big bore rifles is somewhat extreme.......... Lead core bullets will be effected in a serious manner at extreme velocities, followed by copper, and then brass........ Nose Profile and Construction & Material are very important for Factor #6.........

#7 Barrel Twist Rate
Barrel twist rate really only becomes a factor when Factor #1 is DEFICIENT....... If the meplat of caliber is undersized, less than 65%, then faster twist rates WILL INCREASE the depth of penetration by increasing the stability of terminal penetration. A 65% Meplat of Caliber can stabilize in slower twist rates of 1:18, or even slower...... I have seen 65% Meplat of Caliber stabilize with ZERO TWIST....... I have seen 50% Meplat of Caliber stability increase with faster twist rates, and have documentation to prove it, several times...... If you are using a properly designed Solid, then twist rate becomes less important, and more important if you are not using a proper designed solid. Fast Twist Rates can also increase stability of even RN Solids of decent design, hardly anything can increase stability of a more pointy RN FMJ.......


#8 Sectional Density
Sectional Density will ONLY BE A FACTOR with two bullets that are exactly the same in every other Factor or aspect. Factors #1 and #2 far outweigh Sectional Density in the terminal performance of Solids. We can take a properly designed 458 caliber 325 gr Solid and far out penetrate in depth and stability a poorly designed 550 gr 458 caliber bullet....... My son recently shot a medium sized elephant at 10 yards, perfectly executed side brain shot, with a 350 gr .474 caliber properly designed solid at 2200 fps. This bullet exited the head on the far side and still may be going for all I know. A 350 gr .474 caliber bullet has a sectional density of .223, and I personally would choose this little 350 gr bullet over the Woodleigh 500 gr RN FMJ at .4725 (ones I have here) any and every day for any mission............



These are undeniable facts, and can be proven over and over and over again in all test work, and these factors have been exercised in the field and have proven themselves in the field, many many times over...... These are the 8 Known Factors of Terminal Penetration of Solid Bullets.................
 
Hey!!! My thread on indecision between the 416 Rem and 458 Lott was civil. Just sayin'......... :cool:

I think that @Mark A Ouellette nails it. The reason that both theory and experience favor the 416/400 at 2400 fps for penetration is because the smaller frontal area requires less force to penetrate vs the larger calibers. Even though the 458/500 has a higher SD, the SD isn't high enough with a 500 grainer at 2150 fps to overcome the lesser resistance and momentum of the 416/400.

Remember, PO Ackley showed us that a 40 grain bullet from a 220 Swift would punch a hole in armor plating where a 168 grain 30-06 armor piercing round would not.

What I want to know is if a 458/500 at 2300 fps will out penetrate a 416/400 at 2400 fps. With well designed solids, the penetration should increase with velocity, at least to a point. I don't know what that point is. I would think that that given the proper velocity, and 458/500 would out penetrate a 416/400. But I don't know.

I do remember hearing about how the 460 Wby shooting a 500 grainer at 2700 for had poor penetration, but that could have been due to poor bullet design back in the day.
There is no doubt that a 458 at 2300 will out penetrate a 416 at 2400! And I haven’t seen anything in this discussion yet that shows a 416 at 2400 can out penetrate a 458 at 2150!
Here is Kevin “Doctari” Robertson speaking on the subject and though he doesn’t get into specific penetration he does talk a lot about a 500gr round at 2150 being the magic formula!
The SD does not only play a role in the depth of penetration of a bullet. Other parameters are also important, especially the impact velocity. In our case the bullet design and the SD of the bullets can be seen as fairly comparable. For this reason the impact velocity will make the difference and the cartridge 416 Rigby offers more velocity than the cartridge 458 Winchester Magnum.

The cartridge 460 Weatherby Magnum is ahead of the cartridge 416 Rigby when it comes to all of this. Penetration can be, due to a high impact velocity, sometime not as good by using old classic SP bullets, but there is a great shock effect that compensates for a lot.
Robertson talks about a 460 that shoots through three Buff with one shot in this interview and this had to be before most modern bullet tech?

 

Forum statistics

Threads
57,160
Messages
1,223,397
Members
100,265
Latest member
KateHallig
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

TAG SAFARI wrote on mvalden's profile.
Wishing you a Happy Birthday!
TAG SAFARI wrote on K31's profile.
Wishing you a Happy Birthday!
TAG SAFARI wrote on davidg8480's profile.
Wishing you a Happy Birthday!
TAG SAFARI wrote on Daven22s's profile.
Wishing you a Happy Birthday!
TAG SAFARI wrote on bobdahunter84's profile.
Wishing you a Happy Birthday!
 
Top