Rubberhead
AH fanatic
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2021
- Messages
- 600
- Reaction score
- 2,493
- Location
- South Carolina
- Website
- www.flickr.com
- Media
- 44
- Articles
- 6
- Hunted
- South Carolina, South Africa
I've never shot any of the bullets being discussed. I've never loaded a rifle round. I'm 58 and didn't even consider myself a big game hunter until 2017. But, even I knew that the Nosler Partition and Swith A-Frame were designed for different purposes. Even I knew that the Partition, conceived and designed before "bonding" was a thing, was intended to bridge the gap between cup and core type bullets that fragment on impact and solids that drove deep without a lot of "shock". I think I know (I could look this up but I won't to prove my point) that the Partition was designed after Nosler tried to kill a moose with a "deer" bullet. The front of the Partition is designed to fragment and cause shock while the back portion is designed to stay together and push deep. It was not intended to have a 90%+ weight retention. That's a feature not a flaw.
The A-frame was designed to mushroom at the head, stay together and push to a maximum depth at it's new, larger, post-impact frontal cross section while retaining a high percentage of its original weight..
Comparing these to is like arguing which is better a Porsche or Ford F150...
The A-frame was designed to mushroom at the head, stay together and push to a maximum depth at it's new, larger, post-impact frontal cross section while retaining a high percentage of its original weight..
Comparing these to is like arguing which is better a Porsche or Ford F150...