Serious question. Is suppressing sound not the main job of a supressor?
Make sure you are still wearing hearing protection!I think in most cases yes… but there are exceptions… for example my little YHM Resonator K can.. my primary objective was recoil reduction in a very light very compact rifle.. and simply to bring the noise down enough so that I wasn’t ringing my own bell while shooting inside a steel box (deer blind).. I didn’t want a whole lot of additional length added to the rifle.. and wanted the sharp slap of the 4lb 10oz 308 reduced to a less painful level.. sound reduction was the third priority…
Similar situation with the YHM R45 I picked up to use on a 458 SOCOM…
That said, I’m now shopping for a rimfire can.. my objective there is to get a 10/22 so quiet that the only thing you hear is the action cycle.. nothing else really matters much…
Data that comes directly from the manufacturer, especially at a manufacturers home location, is almost completely useless. Even if the data is good, it has the appearance of bias.I’m not downplaying it, but I’d say suppressing sound is one of several factors that should be considered when purchasing a suppressor. Length, weight, POI shift, accuracy, customer support from manufacturer, etc are other potential factors. There is a point of diminishing returns. Would you want a 3’ long, 3” diameter can hanging off the end of a rifle even if it metered the lowest? I’ve been in the game for a very long time and what I’ve noticed is that the decibel chasers tend to be those who are very new to suppressors and have little to no experience with them.
There are simply too many factors involved with measuring dB reduction. Host weapon, ammo used, atmospheric conditions, elevation, etc. You will see variations of several dB even within strings of fire on these tests. Just because a can averages 139dB doesn’t mean there’s 0 chance of it damaging your hearing. As a hearing doctor, Im sure you know that.
I forget all the drama surrounding Jay and pew science. It’s been quite a while since I looked into it. It is mostly a paid service correct? And he wasn’t providing information on how to repeat his data so that others could verify? Manufacturers had to pay him to test their cans inducing bias. Once again, for those who care and are interested, read up on that thread before making a decision.
You should also look at the silencer summit data. TBAC hosted all manufacturers who wanted to attend a metering event of sorts. Using a pulse meter on the same day, same atmospherics, same ammo, same hosts, etc.
Serious question. Is suppressing sound not the main job of a supressor? I keep hearing “there may be others a few decibels quieter,” and downplaying that. That is the main purpose of a can!
Those few decibels might be all the difference in hearing safe or not. It’s a log based scale. 1 decibel is not one step down but base 10.
Also I’m a doctor of hearing. Kind of my wheelhouse. PEW research looks to be a pretty well done study to my eyes
Make sure you are still wearing hearing protection!
Data that comes directly from the manufacturer, especially at a manufacturers home location, is almost completely useless. Even if the data is good, it has the appearance of bias.
I’m sure they make great products. Most people are biased toward the stuff they already own, me included. The original point I was making, is waiting around for something to come out, when there is already a good product out, doesn’t make a lot of sense for someone that doesn’t have brand loyalty.
The cool thing about the AB raptor is you can put a very short stack on the end just for hunting to get the recoil reduction and mild sound suppression. You can then add the reflex portion for range work and get great suppression and even more recoil. reduction.
Agree my man. Fun to talk about.Almost as useless as 3rd party data that is bought and paid for by manufacturers and can’t be replicated?
The event included all manufacturers who wanted to attend and test their products. It wasn’t TBAC doing all the testing and attempting to hide or skew results. Either way, just another data set to look at if you’re interested in dB reduction.
I agree that owners are biased which is why I pointed that out earlier. With that said, and having acquired 35 some odd stamps at this point, I don’t hesitate to trash the products I own and don’t care for. Older YHM stuff comes to mind.
Having said all of that, I really don’t care what a person chooses to spend their money on. I think it’s great we have so many options at this point. And with suppressors becoming more common, maybe legislation to remove them from NFA will gain traction.
I actually shot the non-M Hybrid 46 on my R8 375 barrel a few weeks ago and it worked well. I was hoping to get my early ordered Magnus by now (original ETA was back in April/May) but was informed it'll still be another 6-8 weeks. The Hybrid is a bit heavier but I'll be using it for my buff hunt coming up in September.Has anyone tried this option?
SilencerCo Hybrid 46M - Long Bore Meets Modular
They Hybrid 46M suppressor has the versatility to be used on magnum rifles, pistols, and subguns. Both configurations are full-auto rated.silencerco.com
could i see more pictures of this? i am considering doing this with my model 70, also didn't realize you could bring them into moz. thanksJust returned from a 10-day buffalo hunt in Mozambique. I hunted with my .375 H&H Model 70 suppressed. I used a Silencer Co Hybrid 46. Worked great and I would recommend anyone looking for a large-caliber suppressor to take a look at it. MSRP is $939, and I think they offer 15% off on the website for signing up for an email list.
Just trying to share info for future users doing research like I was last year.
Chase
View attachment 568134