Waterbuck opinion

[375Fox]

Sorry to see you had a bad experience. I’m not sure if it’s a mature waterbuck or not, but definitely not a trophy caliber waterbuck regardless. It’s unfortunately too easy to become a PH and outfitter in South Africa. There are a few really bad ones, a lot of amateurs, and a few professionals. I’d think this a case of a bad amateur incentivized to sell animals from his property rather than the best animals available to the client. Hopefully you’ll write a detailed and professional report.

 

[Ontario Hunter]

I respectfully disagree with your assessment Joe. This is a classic example of a sham being pulled off by a disreputable outfitter if the details given in this report are correct. To classify all South African hunts as being like this is kak as they say over there. I don't know how many times Jacques @JKO HUNTING SAFARIS has told me "No Phil, not the one we're looking for" in regards to I don't know how many species while hunting in South Africa. He did the same, while in Uganda, location was irrelevant. It was the same on my first hunt in RSA with a different PH.

We've seen bad reports come out of Mozambique and Zimbabwe, yet we don't have this propensity for smearing those countries and their PHs due to the poor actions of a few.

I agree. This not "representative" of RSA hunts. Not my experience at all. I hunted my waterbuck on a 167K property, only about a third of it actually accessible for hunting. PH and landowner are HS chums and best friends. Neither have any idea how many waterbuck are on the property. One spring on an inaccessible ridge they counted over sixty with binoculars.

Especially with animals like waterbuck and wildebeest, the client must rely on the PH's judgement for what is or is not an acceptable trophy. What does a client who's never seen African antelope before know about judging size, age, or even sex of some of these species? My third safari I took a kudu that was well short of what the PH thought it would measure. He really felt bad about it but worked out fine for me. It was a long challenging and very difficult stalk. I took a shot that I probably shouldn't have (brush in the way) but that's entirely on me. We did get it a day and a half later. Though shorter than he expected, the bull still had a very pretty set of horns. Also the cape was crap with a bunch of missing hair. Okay because I only wanted the skull anyway. Another client anticipating a shoulder mount would have been hugely disappointed. So, though not +50", it was a very satisfactory hunt for all concerned, even the bull. He was in very tough shape.

I can't see any excuse for this. Not for the PH. Anyone who hunts these animals professionally MUST have known that waterbuck was a dink. From any angle. I know it's a dink and would have laughed at any PH who told me to shoot it. But I have seen maybe a hundred of them. If the PH was the outfitter/landowner, then client should not have paid anything. This is a PH "mistake". Landowner sells the meat and pockets that money. It's essentially a cull hunt.

 

[uplander01]

Live and learn, your hunt, your shot. pH’s are human, and some far better than others.

 

[Inline6]

Live and learn, your hunt, your shot. pH’s are human, and some far better than others.

Yeah we also have to place a certain amount of trust in our PHs.

 

[PARA45]

This is why PHs go to school to become a PH. We can all say, "you shouldn't have shot", well, that is why we are paying the PH to guide us and tell us when to shoot and at what animal. If this was the only male Waterbuck in the property, well, then the PH knew exactly what they were after. Based on the little information we have; I'd say this was a bad and dishonest call on the PH.