I always read all SLUG Threads with great interest.
But what amazes me, is that in gun-liberal America there are huge hunting areas and even states where hunting with rifles is not allowed.Only shotguns with slugs and buckshot.
I can only speculate about the reasons.
But would you have an official explanation for a German hunter where this is totally unusual?
Greetings and thanks
Foxi
I grew up in an area where shotgun slugs were required, but now allows rifles. I also have a German Jagdschein, so I feel somewhat qualified to answer.
German hunters typically, but not always hunt from a Hochsitz, and the downward angle of the shot guarantees a Kugelfang. Stalking is not as typical. Additionally, the limited number of licenses for a Revier limits the number of hunters in the field.
In the US, stalking is more common, and the Hochsitz less so. Very few concern themselves with Kugelfangen. The areas where this is common tend to have very flat and somewhat open terrain. Also, the seasons are shorter, and there is a higher hunter density in given areas. A slug will do very well at close in distances, which means the hunters must be close to shoot, and there is little chance there will be an "unseen" hunter on the ground within the likely ranges.
As has been mentioned, hunter training does play a role. Also not usually considered is how few deer were around (due to previous over-hunting) when many of the laws were passed. Forcing a hunter to get closer created fewer opportunities for a shot.
It's merely a different approach to the same problem set. You can limit "out of control" shots with training and limiting the number of hunters in the area, or you can limit the maximum effective range of the weapon. Personally, I'd rather use a rifle, even though unless I'm in a seat, I still try to stalk to within what would be considered "shotgun range".