time for an update:
I picked the Sabatti rifle up today from my FFL and drove strait to the range. after going over the rifle a little and giving the bores an initial clean I put some rounds down range with mixed results.
first, I will discuss the guns general looks and basic function. as far as appearance goes the rifle is outstanding! the wood, while not premium grade is still pleasing to the eye. the receiver is covered in very detailed engraving"
This engraving was done by a CNC guided cutter, machine made; not made by hand, but it is the best quality of any and all machine engraving I have ever seen myself. The basic pattern and layout WAS designed by a skilled Italian engraver, and, to my eye, is pleasing, though some don't like it.
and is nickel plated. on a funny note, when I told the lady at my FFL that I was going to shoot the gun she looked shocked saying "that rifle belongs on display, not at the range". if you buy one of these you will not be disappointed in the appearance."
The first one I got, was shipped to me via gun dealer in Montana, where I was living at the time. When I went to pick it up, and told the counter clerk why I was there, he said "Oh, you bought that, some sort of buffalo rifle, right?" People just don't understand!
"as far as general function, the rifle is a little stiff to open and the trigger pull is a bit heavy for my liking (around 5 pounds)."
Rifle was stiff, but did you put a thin coat of quality synthetic grease on hook that goes over the hinge pin, and also do same on the Purdey underbolt bite in lump? As you use rifle, it will loosen up a bit---it is new, now, so you have to expect some stiffness. Trigger pull is right on; if it could have safely been lightened up more, Ken Owen would have done it. Guys who lighten up trigger pulls, have to be concerned about liability issues too. 5 pounds, for one of pulls is about right.
the ejectors on the rifle seem to be reliable but I haven't put many rounds threw it. the front sight does leave something to be desired but I suppose I could have that replaced with a fiber optic sight.
"performance: I didn't do enough shooting to get a feel for the accuracy of the gun. todays, shooting was mainly to test regulation and get my self used to the triggers and recoil. the ammo I brought along is as follows.
12 rounds Hornady DGX factory loads
4 rounds Swift A-frame hand loads over 77.5gr of IMR 4350 (modified load from "Shooting the British double rifle")
4 rounds Woodleigh RNSP hand loads over 77.5gr of IMR 4350 (load taken strait from "Shooting the British double rifle")
the two hand loads did not even come close to regulating in the rifle which was a real bummer. I will have to play with them some more and see if I can get them to perform. I really wish I had some 4831 powder to work with but I cant find any.
I know that you wanted to see results from loads suggested in Grame Wrights book, and you did, but rifle wasn't regulated with those loads, it was regulated as it says on the factory target, and that is exactly the load and bullet combination that Ken Owen used when he re-regulated rifle, so that is more than likely the only one it will properly regulate with. Ken Own doesn't load with IMR 4350 or 4831. I have seen where he has been using R15 and IMR 3031 recently for double rifle loads--maybe he uses other powders too, but he wrote a one page article in Double Gun Journal recommending double rifle shooters to not use these slow burning powders, because in the past, some double rifles have been blown apart with their use. He, Ross Seyfried, and Champlin's arms have all written about and recommended against using 4350 and 4831, though Wright suggests no problem at all in their use. On this issue, I am with Ken Owen, Seyfried, and Champlin's, so I continue avoiding use of this powder. If you prefer to use it, go right ahead, but don't send me hate mail saying I am wrong--if I am wrong, I am in good company. I have been shooting double rifles since the 1960s, and have yet to damage or blow up a double rifle. As Seyfried suggests, for all doubles of .400 Nitro caliber on up, I use only one powder, R15.
"the factory loads were close which was a problem, the gun is supposed to be regulated to the factory ammo by Ken Owen. however, they shot about 1 inch too high and 4 inches apart. being an inch high isn't really an issue but 4 inches apart is too much."
Look, the standard for big bore double riffles of ALL makes, is a spread of 3 inches. A skilled regulator can often get this down to 2 inches or less, but it takes patience and a lot of time. If you shot only two rounds, one from each barrel, that is not enough for a firm judgement call. You need to shoot a minimum of at least four, 2 from each barrel, and more would be even better, and use the center of the right group, and center of the left group, to see spread. At 50 yards, Four inches isn't terribly bad with a double rifle, for you are talking about a big bore double rifle; not a precision shooting instrument. again, 3 inches is the standard.
I will try some more hand loads tomorrow using the factory velocity and see if I cant make something work. if im unable to get that 4 inches closed up to about 1-2 inches then I will have to return the rifle."
You really don't understand double rifles, if you expect to get a one inch group; 2 inches would be fantastic, calling for a celebration party. Four inches is quite acceptable, even for a Holland and Holland.
-matt