Datchew
AH enthusiast
- Joined
- May 16, 2023
- Messages
- 346
- Reaction score
- 809
- Location
- San Antonio, Texas
- Media
- 2
- Member of
- School of hard knocks
- Hunted
- Texas, Oregon, Washington, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Kansas, Oklahoma, Maine, Tennessee
Arizona proof of ID - Supreme Court
I'm hoping the author of the article misunderstood the ruling? Perhaps more clarification is forthcoming???
To me, federal should have more stringent requirements. This seems inverted.
(I mean... requiring proof of citizenship is a no brainer and I find it moronic that this is even an issue but alas...)
How on earth does it make sense to allow proof of citizenship to vote in state issues but not in federal ones?
I'm hoping the author of the article misunderstood the ruling? Perhaps more clarification is forthcoming???
To me, federal should have more stringent requirements. This seems inverted.
(I mean... requiring proof of citizenship is a no brainer and I find it moronic that this is even an issue but alas...)
How on earth does it make sense to allow proof of citizenship to vote in state issues but not in federal ones?