There’s hope for you yet!Actually, I have never voted for a Democrat. Now, I canvassed for Carter during college, but that was due to a nursing student I had started dating (still voted GOP though) that was passionate about her politics.
There’s hope for you yet!Actually, I have never voted for a Democrat. Now, I canvassed for Carter during college, but that was due to a nursing student I had started dating (still voted GOP though) that was passionate about her politics.
It is people’s religious view that makes them believe embryos in a Petri dish are babies. And you are right, rationally is in short supply in many folks.
That’d be crazy
What would anyone gain by hiding the death of a president?That’d be crazy
Nothing that I can think of, I’m sure there would be some people dancing in the street. But these days I’m not shocked at anything but I doubt Charlie Kirk would put something out like that with no basis of truth.What would anyone gain by hiding the death of a president?
The situation I proposed was entirely hypothetical and was meant to illustrate my view that the right to life of one person does not give that person claim over another’s body. Clearly, I did not do a good job expressing that point.
The reason why I chose that hypothetical is because regardless of the stage in the pregnancy that one decides to grant a right to life, it does not change the fact that sustaining that life requires the mother’s body. That is why it is my opinion that even if we were to recognize a right to life beginning at conception, the rights of the mother would always supersede it.
Rumor millThat’d be crazy
Especially when a c section can take care of most issues and there’s something like a million people on the adoption listSo what if mother and baby in the womb are both healthy? One of the most intellectually dishonest things is when people refer to an abortion in such a case as this as "health care". Not that you are. Just an example. Killing a healthy baby in such a scenario is pointless and the complete opposite of care.
This was a rumor three days ago reported just about everywhere and about as quickly debunked.
She raised money for rioters. She’s not going to be able to pull off a sudden public safety and law & order stance.She was dealt an impossible hand by Biden, as she was tasked to solve the “root causes” of immigration while the actual border remained solely the purview of Mayorkas.
With regard to public safety, much of the anti-police fervor has died off, but I believe that it is critical for Democrats to show the American people that they take crime seriously if they want to win.
Well, when laws are passed to enforce one's beliefs on others that goes beyond disagreement.
Overall, I am a laissez-faire guy. I don't want government intervention on firearms, economy and yes, even in medical choices of one's own care. People have personal responsibility and have to live with the consequences of their own choices and actions.
It is funny how those on the right supposedly abhor government intervention on people's lives but be the first ones to pass laws for social engineering when it suits their own viewpoints/beliefs. The hypocrisy is amazing. BTW, it goes double for those on the left, but at least they are honest about having the government be a factor in one's life from the cradle to grave.
Lol. My teeth are well protected but I didn’t know you were taking things physical. I was talking mental and intellectually. Perhaps that’s harder for you. We are in agreement most of the time. You’re the one that posted commenting on my post as if I can’t find anything positive about Trump. That’s just not accurate.I'm the drama queen? I'm not the one who was crying like a little bitch about getting "attacked"...
You can trust me... I haven't met that "rock" to break me yet... Another keyboard tough guy... LOL.. I wish I had a dollar for every time I heard somebody tell me that who didn't end up with less teeth than they started out with...
What if a woman wants to have an abortion but the father doesn’t want her to?Re: Abortion
A bunch of guys (and no women) discussing women's rights or legal lack thereof seems kind of wrong to me. Not that I don't have my own opinion, I do.
But in this case I don't think men should even get a vote. Something that a broad spectrum of women, and only women, should decide, IMO. Though that's unlikely to ever happen.
So I guess I have two opinions.
Did the baby do anything wrong?I'm pretty much pro life, but would be happy with some sort of compromise, not that's that's my point.
What if the father is 30 and the girl is 14?