Doug3006
AH legend
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2015
- Messages
- 2,092
- Reaction score
- 8,220
- Media
- 16
- Member of
- SCI, NRA
- Hunted
- Namibia (X2), Zambia, Zimbabwe, South Africa
Hi @BSO Dave! I meant to copy a sentence from your post to comment on. but come to think of it, it works the other way too! We are in agreement that perfection is not obtainable. But I don’t think that perfection should even be the goal. The system we have works great. Better than any other political system devised by man. Tinkering with it, like giving the president lawmaking powers, leads us to misery. When we begin to trust a man, any man, to save us from ourselves, we make a fools bargain. No matter how worthy that man is, sooner or later we’re gonna have a fool in office. The precedent will have been set. And there is no undoing it, short of impeachment. It’s time that we start electing representatives to make laws, a President to execute the law, and a judiciary to read the letter of the law when there’s a dispute.Please don't mistake my reference to Lincoln's use/abuse of his executive powers as an endorsement... I am simply pointing out Lincoln as arguably the most famous historical example of what a POTUS will do when they feel they have no other options to forward their agendas. There where some in Congress making a case to impeach Lincoln for his alleged abuses of power. Had he not been assassinated, it may have happened, but we will never know..
Executive powers are broad and often non-specific in the Constitution especially in regard to war powers and national emergencies. This is where it gets really slippery. Is this by design of the framers? I don't know.. In the Federalist Papers, Hamilton argued adamantly to ensure that that the Chief Executive's power be broad and expansive. When his critics accused him of lobbying for a king by another name, Hamilton really only offers the singular counter argument that a king is an inherited power for life, while a POTUS is elected by his citizenry every 4 years.. There is some very interesting stuff in the Federalist Papers. It's a hard read, but very revealing..
Hi Doug3006,
From your quote above, I'm not sure if you inadvertently added my quote again, or are trying to say that I am the one commenting from the perspective of a perfect system??
In any case, I agree once again.. The system we have is not perfect, but by far the best compared to any other...
I think Churchill's quote says it best:
"Many forms of Government have been tried, and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed it has been said that democracy is the worst form of Government except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.…"
On this topic, I am only trying to say is that the reality is that it happens and will continue to happen... With that reality, I absolutely tolerate an imperfect process by a POTUS that we elect to implement ANY measures necessary to save this country form itself. We are in crisis and emergency..
Getting back to the original conversation where I stated that Trump could accomplish a great deal with executive orders alone, are you saying that all executive orders are unconstitutional?