Yes sir. They were very basic. I had a very strict budget on them, and for once, stuck to it.Yesterday, two Dakotas sold on GB. I had a conflict of interest in sharing them before closing as I was helping someone on a search. But the auctions close so I can share the story:
Two guns from same seller, both made in the 1990s. One gun was a 300HH, the other was a 416 Remington.
I was a fan of the 300HH gun, it was a base model on a 76 action, but it had the upgrade of XXX wood and a barrel band swivel with inletted Ken Howell stud and an ebony forend tip. No other upgrades whatsoever. Small bores that look nice aren't all that common. It sold just over $3600 and had the build sheet. It did not have a quarter rib and it had no iron sights, but it was a dandy of a gun in 300HH for American hunting or plains game.
The second gun I strongly suggested people in my circle avoid if they wanted a collector gun. It was a 416 Remington (I do not like them from a collector perspective) and it had mediocre wood, no extended floor plate, no upgrades, and it had simple iron sights with an island base. (no quarter rib, recoil reducer, etc.) That gun went for about $4000 which I didn't feel was a good value considering the much higher quality guns that are out there.
Both guns had the wonky leupold bases that obstructed the ejection port, but for $300 or so could have been swapped out for Talley rings and bases which I'm sure the owners will do.
Just passing on the info if you're keeping track of the Dakota collector world. I know people rave about the "Don Allen era" Dakota guns, but these particular guns didn't reflect a quality that was as high as later guns.


Last edited by a moderator: