Roosevelt is a hero in the world of conservation, but the fact remains that he was a terrible shot. This is pretty well documented and he admitted to as much.
As much as I love Hemingway, Raurk, and others, they were seriously flawed individuals. I don’t think the criticism of them is out of line.
There are plenty of videos out there of crappy shooting by clients with doubles. Many more videos with crappy shooting edited out. One that comes to mind the the video of Cal Papas, who was a double rifle expert and as I understand it an all around class act and wonderful human being, missing a buffalo with both barrels. It would have been a chip shot with a scoped bolt gun. For Cal and many others the rifle was a much a part of the experience as the hunt itself. There is nothing wrong with that. I’m leaving for Zim later this week with one gun, a double with irons. I understand his passion.
I also don’t have to agree with everything our Canadian buddy said to be offended by the way he was treated here. Calling him arrogant was uncalled for and out of line. You don’t have to be a veteran of many DG safaris across multiple countries to have a voice on this forum. Telling someone that their opinion isn’t valid because they have only hunted one buffalo in RSA is decidedly not cool in my book.
I like this forum because it is generally more civil than the rest of the internet. We should be able to voice opinions here and not be met with personal attacks.