Not many guys have taken 3+ leopards. You've got the sickness! Nicely done.
I used to used the Berger 195s out of my 28 and I quickly changed because of a scenario like this. Or worse, exploding the round on a bull elk shoulder.100% agree with @Red Leg , the Berger bullet will do it's job. You will probably not like the results. This bobcat was 35 yards away with a 28 Nosler pushing a Berger 180.
View attachment 547456
100% agree with @Red Leg , the Berger bullet will do it's job. You will probably not like the results. This bobcat was 35 yards away with a 28 Nosler pushing a Berger 180.
View attachment 547456
That is exactly what I said!As my Namibian PH Augustinus said after walking up to the Jackal; "No Taxidermy" While shaking his head. (.270 130 grain TTSX length ways on a Jackal)
It is not liked as a leopard bullet in general. You will likely be ok with that big of a caliber however. I would ask your PH.I have a leopard and elephant combo hunt coming up in Zim. I'm thinking of taking one rifle (416 Rigby) to do the elephant, bait animals and leopard. I'm going to verify that I can get Barnes 400 solids and 400 TSX to print close together. Has anyone used TSX on leopard? I know that's more gun than is needed but I just returned from a 1 gun hunt (.375 TSX on buff, croc, sable and honey badger) and it was so nice to simplify paperwork and packing and always have the right gun. In this case it would be TSX and solids but if they print close together, it could be a good option. I'm checking with the PH of course but wondered about TSX experience on leopard.
You want good, quick expansion with the thin skinned leopard. Get Swift SciroccosWow you guys have really shaken me up and now I'm confused. I'm hunting leo next June. My 300 win mag is putting 4 shots inside of a dime 1.5 high at 100 with TSX.
Now I'm confused.
Sorry but Bergers have yet to prove themselves as Hunting bullets for big game. I know they are all the rage with the handloaders and western hunters but they are not in the conversation for Africa IMO.This is something I have thought about. There is potential with the fast Bergers to blow out the off side and I'm hoping for a full mount taxidermy. What about switching the scope over to a 7x57? Any load recommendations for that?
Boddington recommends Swift Scirocco 2 for leopard. I would not use SST. Y'all need to read The Perfect Shot and get educated on Hunting bullets.I thought I read positive comments from Boddington on the SST? I've heard negative on almost every bullet made but I don't buy into this thinking that XYZ brand sucks. Some don't like X bullets but then my PH says the TSX is his favorite buffalo bullet along with A-frames. Worked well for me and put one down in less than 20 yards.
Philip I generally agree with you. On this I think you have not been properly educated. I have a thread from a couple of years ago about the Berger in Africa. I am running a 180 gr Berger VLDH in a 7 SAUM at 2900 fps. It hits a sweet spot with this bullet. I and a friend using my rifle have killed over 30 animals. All but 1 was a 1 shot kill. That includes 3 eland. I used a 2nd shot on a huge Livingston eland in Zambia although it was likely unnecessary. He was significantly bigger than my buffalo I killed a couple of days earlier.Sorry but Bergers have yet to prove themselves as Hunting bullets for big game. I know they are all the rage with the handloaders and western hunters but they are not in the conversation for Africa IMO.
Yes! Bergers get press because they are very frangible and will open at extreme ranges that seems to be the trendy conversation of today. Problems of extreme range sniping of big game... like poor hits or unforeseen conditions or changing wind or misjudgment of trajectory compensation or basic extended range 100% repeatable precision/accuracy and so on never get into the conversation when discussing the best bullet for "sniping". The conversion goes straight to bullets that will expand at much lower impact velocity after a 500-700 or more! yard journey and magically hit the lethal 9 inch diameter target on an average deer/sheep sized animal at a perfect perpendicular or slightly away angle. The conversation invariably skips right over the most important parts of a high percentage lethal kill and goes straight to the expansion issue. Locally we call them "Berger Bombs". Because, after testing in media at normal range impact velocity, the results look like a bomb went off just under the skin of the test media resulting in a crater wound and very little penetration. The ideal range of impact velocity is very very narrow with these bullets. I have learned to err on the side of a tougher bullet for any job for big game hunting, never a more frangible one. There are too many available, tough, predictable expanding bullets on the market to be monkeying around with frangible, thin jacketed cup and core designs.Sorry but Bergers have yet to prove themselves as Hunting bullets for big game. I know they are all the rage with the handloaders and western hunters but they are not in the conversation for Africa IMO.
Exactly.....well said....Yes! Bergers get press because they are very frangible and will open at extreme ranges that seems to be the trendy conversation of today. Problems of extreme range sniping of big game... like poor hits or unforeseen conditions or changing wind or misjudgment of trajectory compensation or basic extended range 100% repeatable precision/accuracy and so on never get into the conversation when discussing the best bullet for "sniping". The conversion goes straight to bullets that will expand at much lower impact velocity after a 500-700 or more! yard journey and magically hit the lethal 9 inch diameter target on an average deer/sheep sized animal at a perfect perpendicular or slightly away angle. The conversation invariably skips right over the most important parts of a high percentage lethal kill and goes straight to the expansion issue. Locally we call them "Berger Bombs". Because, after testing in media at normal range impact velocity, the results look like a bomb went off just under the skin of the test media resulting in a crater wound and very little penetration. The ideal range of impact velocity is very very narrow with these bullets. I have learned to err on the side of a tougher bullet for any job for big game hunting, never a more frangible one. There are too many available, tough, predictable expanding bullets on the market to be monkeying around with frangible, thin jacketed cup and core designs.