- Joined
- Dec 12, 2011
- Messages
- 6,646
- Reaction score
- 20,521
- Media
- 148
- Member of
- NRA life, DSC, SCI
- Hunted
- Minnesota, Texas, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, British Columbia, Argentina, Kansas, Macedonia, Australia, Tanzania, Iceland
Some ten years ago, while researching for an article I was writing on 19th century smooth-bore ‘rifles’, I did some tests with a friend of mine with modern slugs for shotguns. My friend has brought his 1910 Holland & Holland 12-bore Royal Nitro Paradox for Magnum Charge (with blade-sights 50 – 100 and 150 yds). As he could not get hold of Paradox ammo, he wanted to try the gun with Brenneke slugs. Not a good idea though, a Brenneke slug having its own rifling, and highly NOT recommended by this London gunmaker.
Brenneke slugs, however tempting, are probably not a good idea, the bullet having its own 'rifling', and most certainly not recommended by H&H as in my case.
As written earlier I suggest you should carefully measure / having measured the bore, and order a bullet mould from CastBulletEngineering or other on these specs or 0,xxxx mm (see previous contribution) under.
I have some original 12 bore tools that I would sell. Nothing in 16 though.
Ola Paco,Bonjour Caldix!!
Thanks for your kind words
Yes, I already have fully documented the history, after having asked H&H for its history.
Yes, the gun has 3 sights, 50-100 and 150 yard (veeeery optimistic?) I was not aware that magnum guns had 3 sights, and non magnum had 2. I dont have the gun with me to check the action, but I can post the records I have.
Although I fully understand your thoughts about the classic Brenneke slugs with fins, I still have to consider the sabot/jacket ones, because in that case, the slug will never get in touch with the barrel or rifling, getting the plastic jacket all the deformation at the barrel and rifling. In that case, that the slug has or not fins, should not be an issue. Brenneke is just a company, and they have many models
Precisely, people with modern Paradox style guns, with interchangeable rifling chokes, refer sabot/jacket ones. Some reading I found on a company that manufactures modern chokes with rifling : https://store.geminichokes.com/en/blog/paradox-or-spreader-n9 They clearly recommend slug with plastic jacket/sabot
I have found 2 other alternative with plastic sabot or jacket
![]()
Cartuchos SAUVESTRE, bala FLECHE BFS, calibre 16/67/16 | Armeria Alberdi
www.armeriaalberdi.comhttps://www.decathlon.es/es/p/bala-brenneke-17-g-sin-plomo-calibre-16-67-x-5/_/R-p-331365?mc=8640188
You might think, why don’t he just reloads (as you suggested)??. I have never reloaded (no experience what so ever), and MOST important, in Spain, reloading is very restricted, you need license that is very difficult to obtain to reload and to buy/store the elements, etc... So for me, reloading is not an option.
I send you some quick images I have at hand
I have some original 12 bore tools that I would sell. Nothing in 16 though. View attachment 683836View attachment 683839View attachment 683838
I have some original 12 bore tools that I would sell. Nothing in 16 though. View attachment 683836View attachment 683839View attachment 683838
I have some original 12 bore tools that I would sell. Nothing in 16 though. View attachment 683836View attachment 683839View attachment 683838
I have some original 12 bore tools that I would sell. Nothing in 16 though. View attachment 683836View attachment 683839View attachment 683838
I have some original 12 bore tools that I would sell. Nothing in 16 though. View attachment 683836View attachment 683839View attachment 683838
Hi GG505,I have some original 12 bore tools that I would sell. Nothing in 16 though. View attachment 683836View attachment 683839View attachment 683838
Sorry, I don't understand your message, what is cross-eyed exactly?I have managed to shoot completely ‘cross-eyed’ with an 1872 Purdey 40-bore DB cf rifle at 50 m, just for not using the charges she was regulated with.
The charge and type of powder your 16-bore # 15 802 has been regulated with, is alas not stated in the ‘provenance’ by H&H (you surely did your homework!) and, alas not given either, on page 224 of the Paradox book you so wisely ordered
I can also recommend Graeme WRIGHT: Shooting the British Double Rifle, as from the 2nd edn, chapter 12. When I contacted Greame for my 1893 10-bore Royal Paradox, he was most helpful.