Do you think it's a sustainable move though? I just can't picture the bases remaining named after Confederates in perpetuity. When they leaned into taking Confederate names off of everything I thought it would have been a better idea to just rename anything that was named after a Confederate to someone who died in the GWOT (I'm originally from the Richmond, VA area, lots of Jeff Davis this and Stonewall Jackson that stuff around there). I always thought it would have been better for conservatives to get ahead of the narrative and maintain a decent naming convention in the spirit of honoring people who served, and to keep everything from being named after some trans activist or George Floyd or something.
There was an alumni from a local High School in the RVA area (Spc. Clarence Adams III) that was killed in Iraq in 2004. He was a black guy, football player, good student, etc. His older brother served in the Gulf War, his dad in Vietnam, and his grandfathers in a segregated military in WWII. It would have made sense to me to take something named after a Confederate, and change it to something after him, to honor his and his families' service, easy political win too.
I don't personally have any issues with CSA memorials or anything, just seemed like a way to get ahead of it.