Rolex Ad - If You Hunted Big Game The World Over You'd Wear A Rolex

AfricaHunting.com

Founder
AH ambassador
Joined
Oct 1, 2007
Messages
13,134
Reaction score
9,300
Website
www.africahunting.com
Media
5,597
Articles
321
rolex-ad-rhino.jpg
rolex-rhino-ad.jpg
rolex-black-rhino-ad.jpg
rolex-purdey-ad.jpg
 
Looks like a Submariner as well. Never leave home without it!
 
I'll stick to my Breitling :)
 
In the first ad: "Guaranteed to a depth of 165 ft."

These days that is what the Swiss/German/Japanese watch industry rates their "dress watches, for the office" at. For outdoors activities they now offer watches with 6 times that rating.

Technology has certainly improved since those adverts and those watches were new.
 
Most I have spent on a watch is $1200 bucks for the one I wear now, best time keeper I have owned. Its called a MIDO Ocean Star Diver, Swiss watch, automatic Chronometer rated, good for nearly 2000'.
My older brother bought a Rolex many years ago when it was still less than a grand, still has it.
 
I have a Rolex. It is an Air King that was passed down from my father in law. Beautiful watch that keeps crappy time. That said, even though it has been rebuilt more than once, the watch dates from 1955 making it a couple of years older than me. We all get a little slower as we age. :)
 
In the first ad: "Guaranteed to a depth of 165 ft."

These days that is what the Swiss/German/Japanese watch industry rates their "dress watches, for the office" at. For outdoors activities they now offer watches with 6 times that rating.

Technology has certainly improved since those adverts and those watches were new.
The sealing technology might, but the movement technology is still very old school. Besides, my 1970's Submariner does awfully well in all conditions I have ever faced. Then again, I don't swim below 165 ft as much as some may. :E Angel:
 
Rolex went on to make further technical advances that rendered the Submariner waterproof to a depth of 200 metres (660 feet) in 1954, and 300 metres (1,000 feet) in 1989. The version with date, introduced in 1969, would be waterproof to a depth of 300 metres (1,000 feet) by 1979.

Date Just:

WATER RESISTANCE
Waterproof to 100 metres / 330 feet
 
 
I'm with John Candy on this. I'll wear my quartz analog Casio when I need to, not worry about it and not look back. Oh and I don't wear bling :)
 
I'm with John Candy on this. I'll wear my quartz analog Casio when I need to, not worry about it and not look back. Oh and I don't wear bling :)
I WOULD like to be wearing my Citizen Eco Drive if I ever get it back from their Georgia repair facility. They've had it since July 26!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
54,781
Messages
1,162,714
Members
94,834
Latest member
QIFFletche
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

SETH RINGER wrote on tracker12's profile.
PARTITIONS
SEND ME PAYMENT INFO, PLEASE AND THANKS.
Khalanyoni Game Ranch wrote on Joshlee0518's profile.
Hi Joshlee0518 (please let me know if you are fine being addressed like that),

Thought I would drop you a PM. It is super exciting to plan a hunt and we are more than happy to assist you. Have you given any thought yet to which species you would like to take?

What do you hunt usually and which weapons/calibers are you using?

Look forward to swapping experiences and ideas.

Happy hunting - Daniel
Our trophy shed is filling up and we are only getting started,

cwpayton wrote on CM McKenzie's profile.
Sir ,is that picture of you packing the shoshone river trail thru buffalo pass? Im trying to get a plan togather for a ride. do you pack professionally or for pleasure. thanks
Cal {cwpayton}
ghay wrote on gearguywb's profile.
Is this rifle sold? If not what is the weight of it and do you know if there is enough difference in diameter between the 35W and the 9.3 to allow for a rebore to a 9.3x62 which is what I am after?
Thanks,
Gary (Just down the road in Springfield)
 
Top