calling4life
AH veteran
Have them bring in Griz, the rich skiers I'm sure are just besides themselves not being able to see the cuddly teddy bears.
Wolves aren't the problem. The fact that they can't be managed as they should is the problem.
I agree with you.. Although I'd argue that they absolutely can be managed properly..
No policy without sufficient forethought and follow through will ever be successful. That’s the problem with bureaucracy. Wolves could be brought into an ecosystem, and I would hazard a guess with proper management (think hunting/trapping quotas) they may even prove to be a net positive.I dont think its about convenience..
I think its about greenies not thinking things completely through..
They want the feel good side of the equation..
But they dont want responsibility for properly managing the results of their decisions.. or to be held accountable for the consequences of the refusal to manage..
I dont know of a single area (maybe there is one? if Im wrong, sincerely, someone please correct me) where the reintroduction of wolves has been truly successful in a manner that actual outdoorsmen and conservationists would define "success"..
You nailed it!Wolves aren't the problem. The fact that they can't be managed as they should is the problem.
You nailed it! The original goal for wolves in the U.P. was 200-250 spread throughout the area but with no plan to manage them once that goal was met and we still are not allowed to control them. Because of our extremely high snow totals in the winter 200-300+ inches the deer concentrate in yarding areas where they have thermal cover and browse to survive but they are stuck there till the snow melts. The wolves can just pick them off at will and they do! We could probably tolerate the original goal numbers but not 4-5 times that number. Those who don't have to live with the consequences of wolves just don't know how much they don't know.
We don't need any more here. These pics were taken a month ago, north of Silverthorne about 12 miles, roughly 18 miles due west of Frasier. I took these pics a couple miles from any place a domestic dog could have come from. It took me a bit to realize what I was looking at as these were way too big for any coyote, but way too deep in the woods (and no people tracks besides mine), to be domestic dogs. We found this set of 3 animals, and in two other places, single sets. The top rest of my quad sticks is 5" wide for scale. I would have happily applied the 3S method to one if I'd seen it.
View attachment 575530
View attachment 575531
View attachment 575532
I agree, hogs and wolves are different. Not being able to manage wolves once introduced is political and not an issue of being able to control their populations.In the lower 48 it is actually pretty easy. You just have to want to and most importantly have the legal ability to. Trapping and hounds can do a number on wolves in short order. In Canada and Alaska I can see it being much more difficult just because of the remoteness.
But get a trapper who knows what he's doing and they can pile up the rugs. Wolves and hogs are apples and oranges.
No policy without sufficient forethought and follow through will ever be successful. That’s the problem with bureaucracy. Wolves could be brought into an ecosystem, and I would hazard a guess with proper management (think hunting/trapping quotas) they may even prove to be a net positive.
Have them bring in Griz, the rich skiers I'm sure are just besides themselves not being able to see the cuddly teddy bears.
Sorry for the not so great pics. The toenails were definitely visible in person. My son and I spent a bit of time inspecting and even trailing for a ways to find definitive prints. When I first saw them, my initial thought was lion, but then I saw the toenails and elongation.View attachment 575541
I'm not seeing any claw marks in those tracks. I'd wonder if they were kitty tracks?
2 paws hitting the same place. Notice the "extra" toe?That middle pic almost looks like a canine in back and feline in front.