Kiwifire111
AH member
A Ruger No1 in 300H&H, to fill the gap in my No1 collection between 275 Rigby and 375H&H, very thin on the ground in Australia.
@Kiwifire111A Ruger No1 in 300H&H, to fill the gap in my No1 collection between 275 Rigby and 375H&H, very thin on the ground in Australia.
Bob, a couple Qs - 1). does a 26” barrel add meaningful velocity to a standard .270 round? I thought that 24” takes full advantage of that caliber but am no expert in ballistics. I personally do Not care for any rifle barrel over 24” “unless” its really adding to that rifles performance - as some of the Magnums seem to require. I think the long barrels also look odd (although on a Ruger No 1 it might look fine) and if rifles have a muzzle break or suppressor on it — I break out in a “rash”.@Kiwifire111
If you find one be prepared to pay big $$$. My mate just sold a No1 in 270 with a 26 inch barrel. He didn't really want to so he priced it at $2,600. The bloody thing sold in 2 hours of placing the add. He ended up with an early Marlin 444 with an 18 inch factory ported barrel. Problem is with the straight stock it beats the snot out of him with the 265gn loaded with 2207. He settled on the 240gn deep URL and a load of Benchmark 2.
Ridiculous.
Bob
There was one years ago called the 460 guns and ammo based on the 404j.... Been doing some research, thanks to Anthony George, N T Gunsmith, and the Free Library post; for a D/G rifle, the African Express (based on the 404J)would top my list; no silly belt, at least equals, if doesn't exceed the Lott's performance, with the same magazine capacity. In addition, it's an African "invention/development, where 95% of our D/G hunting would occur. I know that A G has a reamer, and dies, plus Bertram (Australia) may have brass as well as South Afrika. In addition, the range of high-quality bullets is sufficient for the most fastidious hunter. Comments, anyone?
@hank BuckBob, a couple Qs - 1). does a 26” barrel add meaningful velocity to a standard .270 round? I thought that 24” takes full advantage of that caliber but am no expert in ballistics. I personally do Not care for any rifle barrel over 24” “unless” its really adding to that rifles performance - as some of the Magnums seem to require. I think the long barrels also look odd (although on a Ruger No 1 it might look fine) and if rifles have a muzzle break or suppressor on it — I break out in a “rash”.
Q. 2). Did not know that a Marlin .444 kicked that hard. I have a Marlin 1895 in .45-70 and with full power loads (Buffalo bore) it kicks way too hard for me - so much so that I contradicted my above comment and put a “muzzle brake” on it - yes ugly as hell and makes me a hypocrite but it was either that or sell it. I thought “should’ve gotten it in.444” but your post got me thinking that might not of mattered??
A Ruger No1 in 300H&H, to fill the gap in my No1 collection between 275 Rigby and 375H&H, very thin on the ground in Australia.
One Mr Howell had version(s) too, neck-ups, expansions, etc ...There was one years ago called the 460 guns and ammo based on the 404j.
@meigsbucksNo holes to fill. Three rounds I’ve always wanted: .22 Hornet, .257 Wby and .375 Wby. Wouldn’t mind a 6.5 Grendel bolt gun.
Bob, i assume you’re 1885 Marlin = 1895? Also, funny you mention that 350 trainers at 2200fps “cut your lead finger” - I found the exact same thing when using Buffalo Bore 350 gr. I was sighting in at the bench and getting very beat up, took a break and another shooter asked me about the gun - I told him “kicks a lot”. He asked to take a shot and I warned him “just hold on to it tight” and he laughed a bit “I’ve got a .338 win mag” - like I was some sissy. He took one shot (from the bench) - scope cut his eye brow and loop/trigger guard cut his finger...he wasn’t laughing (I’m happy he didn’t sue me). After that I had the muzzle break installed and tamed that rifle by 25% or so — still unpleasant and I rarely use Buffalo Bore, have found that the slightly tamer Hornady Leverevolution 325 gr.provides all the power needed and while it doesn’t penetrate as well - it’s “enough” for most@hank Buck
The 26" barrel adds abot 50fps to the velocity. That's just what his No1 came with.
The straight stock doesn't fit him as well as the pistol grip stock so it seems to kick harder to him.
He had an 1885 marlin guide gun in 45-70 that I stocked up with 350 grainers at 2,200fps. That bitch would cut your lead finger in the lever loop with every shot unless you were careful. I offered to load some 495s to 1,700fps but he declined. He sold it because it was was to much for him.
I have a misbegotten maverick 12 gauge that weights 7lbs. That thing with 3" slug loads gets your attention. Equivalent to a 500gn bullet at 1,600fps.
Bob
@HankBuckBob, i assume you’re 1885 Marlin = 1895? Also, funny you mention that 350 trainers at 2200fps “cut your lead finger” - I found the exact same thing when using Buffalo Bore 350 gr. I was sighting in at the bench and getting very beat up, took a break and another shooter asked me about the gun - I told him “kicks a lot”. He asked to take a shot and I warned him “just hold on to it tight” and he laughed a bit “I’ve got a .338 win mag” - like I was some sissy. He took one shot (from the bench) - scope cut his eye brow and loop/trigger guard cut his finger...he wasn’t laughing (I’m happy he didn’t sue me). After that I had the muzzle break installed and tamed that rifle by 25% or so — still unpleasant and I rarely use Buffalo Bore, have found that the slightly tamer Hornady Leverevolution 325 gr.provides all the power needed and while it doesn’t penetrate as well - it’s “enough” for most