Bob Nelson 35Whelen
AH ambassador
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2018
- Messages
- 11,315
- Reaction score
- 28,012
- Location
- Wyong new south Wales Australia
- Media
- 130
- Member of
- SSAA
- Hunted
- Australia
Standard VelocityYes and no.
I don’t like phrases like “no replacement for displacement” because they are often oversimplified and incorrect. I do generally live by this one though because, in my experience, it may not always be correct, but it’s rarely wrong.
Too many people, in my opinion, depend on bullet technology to overcome physics and material properties of metals. Lead and copper have physical limits.
A screaming fast 338 may blow up three inches in while a plodding bullet of same weight and caliber will plow right through. Surely this can happen with a 378 Weatherby Magnum too, but the man who’s man enough to fire it can just punch the buffalo in the face anyway.
A 375 H&H, with a 300 grain Partition or A Frame, will provide predictable performance for it’s entire point blank range. Same can be said for a properly constructed solid.
The newfangled monometal projectiles appear to be well designed and provide a dependable performance envelope according to many. I have zero personal experience with them on game though. If what is said is true they may provide the ability to take one step down in caliber across the board.
The one and only time I have lost an animal was because I had begun to believe the hype about a new bullet. At 80 yards it was going fast enough to blow up on the shoulder. Had the bullet even been a cup-and-core soft point it probably would have made it through.
A body who is unable or unwilling to tolerate a 375 may aught to pick a different game to play. No need to lower the bar.
I 100% agree with your statement on the 375. My recoil tolerances now preclude me from the use of anything bigger than my 35 Whelen. This places a PERSONAL limit on the size of game I would ETHICALLY hunt to a max of water buffalo which I hope one day to do.
Cheers mate Bob