View attachment 450316
I don’t remember when or how I first came to learn about this cartridge, maybe it was one of the articles here or some other source, but it began an infatuation over an obsolete Canadian built relic.
View attachment 450320
For the last few years I had watched online for rifles to come for sale, almost pulling the trigger a couple times, but eventually backing out. I had also considered looking for a Mauser chambered in this offering, but they seemed to be nearly non-existent.
Two weeks or so, one popped up in some classifieds, and once the price was agreed upon, the deal was done! Yesterday UPS kindly brought the package to my door.
View attachment 450328
View attachment 450329
After a quick once over with bronze wool and Kroil, there’s a fair amount of petina, but the bore seems shiny and no pitting. The stock could use a refinish, and the checkering gone through, but there doesn’t seem to be any defects that wouldn’t steam out, and the inletting seems flawless to my eyes.
Now before a mother hen on here tells me “I’ll take my eye out with this thing”, you can watch the locking lugs spin 90 degrees into place.
I really want to hunt with this rifle, brass is available, pricy, but available. Hawk makes a 160gr .286 bullet, Woodliegh makes (or made) 140 and 170gr .287 bullets. Hammer bullets said they can make whatever I spec them, and I’m not sure if there any other companies that would do the same. Now dies are a different story, I have to wait for CH4 to do a production run, unless you guys know where would be a good spot to watch used ones come up.
Now optics, this rifle comes with a single folding blade, and I have to say, the front bead seems to have the most visibility of the few I have. There was a Porter Popup Peep sight available as an option, but this rifle didn’t come with one. I would like to scope the rifle, so that would leave me two options, a traditional G&H side mount, which I don't care for, or a more traditional front and rear bridge configuration.
The front bridge is the same as any other rifle, so that’s straight forward, but the rear bridge is another story. It’s screwed into the receiver, and there’s a dovetailed block where the peep sight would go.
View attachment 450336
View attachment 450337
Would there be enough strength to have some sort of base machined to fit in that dovetail?
All in all I’m excited about this rifle, and can see why it was hearlded for being ahead of it’s time. The straight pull is slicker that goose shit, but I can also see why it wouldn’t be great in a muddy trench.
I may post some pages from Terry Weilands “Great Hunting Rifles” later today if any members would like to read a pretty well written in-depth look at the rifles.
Anyway, thanks for reading my ramblings, and I hope I can do my part in reviving some interest for a long forgotten rifle, too advanced for the components of its time, and doomed a fate based on oft repeated third hand hearsay.