- Reviews
- 25
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2010
- Messages
- 7,593
- Reaction score
- 16,054
- Location
- Eastern Cape, South Africa
- Website
- www.huntsafaris.co.za
- Deals & offers
- 136
- Media
- 1,305
- Articles
- 2
- Member of
- DSC Life Member ; Eastern Cape Game Management Association ; PE Pistol and Rifle Club
- Hunted
- South Africa, Namibia, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, New Zealand, USA, Canada
A motion has been passed that disassociates PHASA with the captive-bred lion industry until such a time that the industry can convince PHASA and the IUCN that the practice is beneficial to lion conservation.
I think before we arrive at conclusions and start making predictions we should stop and consider these words from the PHASA statement and look at the history of this issue. I say this as one who supports RSA lion hunting of raised lions even though I've never been on one and may never even if I can. The simple reason for that is that it does keep lion breeders in business and the conservation of the African lion may someday depend on these operations.
A bit of reflection on the history.....
1. There are members of our international hunting community that are opposed and some quite strongly so to raised lion hunting in RSA. I've read many of those arguments against over and over again and while I disagree with many, some seem valid to me. Regardless of what I think of their arguments, until they have been made to change their minds, it's a most difficult situation to fight for saving RSA lion hunting. I'm also certain that hurling insults and making unsubstantiated claims against our fellow hunters is not a strategy for success.
2. One of if not the leading cause of trouble for RSA lion hunting is how the term "canned" it seems is how this hunting is almost always referred to. At it's worst "canned" brings up images of a lion within a small enclosure with a shooter putting a bullet through or over the fence. It also includes whether we like it or not, the very real videos of "hunters" going after cats that have been recently released in proximity to the "hunt" still feeling the effects of sedation and completely unfamiliar with its surroundings. It wouldn't totally surprise me if there were AH'ers who unwittingly/unknowingly have been on such hunts. Do these unethical operators represent a majority, a significant minority or very insignificant minority of the RSA lion hunt operators? I don't know, but I really don't think it matters. The perception is unfortunately reality for many that it is the majority or at least a way too significant minority.
3. "Cecil" - DSC/SCI and whoever else were caught not being prepared for such a situation. I hope that those organizations have learned from it, but the fact is you can't undo what was done and we lost ground there in the court of world opinion.
4. Blood Lions - I haven't seen it, not even any clips so I can't speak to it, but I get the overall gist. Lion's being bred in less than ideal conditions, is it any different than the puppy mills here in the U.S.? I haven't had a hunting dog in years, but I assure you if I ever do again it won't come from such an operation.
So all that said, let's look at the opening that PHASA left if their statement. I remarked to Jacques shortly after the Cecil situation came out that PHASA needed to step in and find a way to promote the good of RSA lion hunting and rid itself of the bad. It seems from there statement that there is an opening at PHASA, but changes will be required. Can this in the end be a good thing? I think it's time to name and shame the unethical operators. It may also be time for better cooperation between the various African nations and team effort in lion conservation. If this action by PHASA is the catalyst to bring such positive changes about, then I say good for them.
In the end this event could be a sign of the end of lion hunting, but I hope not. I think the one thing to keep in mind, is the U.S. nor any other country not in Africa can tell you if you can hunt or not. Only the African nations can do that. Elephant hunting has not been banned in Zimbabwe or Tanzania, you just can't bring any parts back to the U.S. Now I have the luxury of having some taxidermy from Africa with more in the making. But if I had the time and money to go to Zim for an ele hunt, I'd go and screw the U.S. gov't. You're not going to stop me from going hunting, I'll have replicas made if that's what it comes down to or just be satisfied with pictures. Taxidermy just serves as a reminder of the hunts I've been on and I'm glad to have it, but at this point if all I could bring back were digital images then so be it. Would I go lion hunting under the same circumstances? Yes I would. Would I be disappointed if I couldn't have the pleasure of a lion mount in my home, yes I would but it's not going to stop me from enjoying the experience.
So I say lets stay positive that this is a turning point which will make things better and not worse and don't let the gov't stop you from being the hunter/conservationist over taxidermy.
Yes! Absolutely Phil. Wise words spoken there.