After reading all the comments and reviewing my own feelings on this video I was struck by the similarity of "our" reactions to the "other" folks reactions to a hunting issue.
These comments were about the GQ article.
Here is a sample of comments posted in reaction to this question: What kind of person would shoot an elephant?:
"I couldn't even get through the first page of this article. I believe that people like this are psychotic. I understand hunting for food, but to kill a magnificent creature like an elephant to feed their ego is just heartbreaking. What a bunch of pieces of shit."
"An idiot and a coward that deserves nothing short of what he did to the animals."
"The picture of her smiling next to the posable dead elephant with faint streak of blood is creepily eery. What feeling supersedes the fact that animal died for no better reason than pride and ego...shameful, disgusting, insane"
"Hunting for sport alone is stupid. You want to make it a real sport? Make it to where there's a real chance that the hunter can get hurt as well."
"can we hunt them and see how they feel? I wouldent mind shooting these ppl"
"I can't understand this kind of thing... theres no justify... ignorance."
However, there is a difference between WHY we feel the way we do, when we see blatant acts of cruelty and law-breaking, and what the anti-hunters feel when they discuss hunting in general.
Most anti-hunters know absolutely nothing about hunting, how it is conducted or why it is conducted. Many simply regurgitate the images thrust upon them by deceitful organisations, such as PETA and IDA; just to name two of the most dishonest. The general public are neither with us or against us; they are actually not opposed to hunting when it is conducted correctly. However, they are easily taken in by the lies of the anti-hunting organisations who describe us as fiends and psychopaths and these organisations get away with it because they are so vocal and they are definitely better at ‘marketing’ their cause than us hunters are at educating the public.
If you don’t know much about PETA, just take a look at the evil (and that is the only word to describe it) cartoons that PETA intend to malign fishermen and fisherwomen in the eyes of their children (see
http://www.peta.org/features/daddy-kills-animals/).
And just take a look at how IDA put forward their view of hunting; “Hunting is a violent and cowardly form of outdoor “entertainment” that kills hundreds of millions of animals every year, many of whom are wounded and die a slow and painful death.” This quote is directly from their page on hunting.
It is almost as if Green Mile is a member of PETA or IDA, or in cahoots with them, and this is why we, the hunting fraternity, cannot afford to allow anyone, like Green Mile, to continue to operate and continue to provide such a great source of ammunition to the anti-hunters.
Why am I so angry with Green Mile and revolted by the video that has been aired? Because they have allowed cruelty, that is offensive to both hunters and non-hunters alike, to be carried out under the pretence of ‘hunting’, that they then have dared to defend their indefensible position and blame everyone else and, finally, they have put another nail into the coffin of legitimate sport hunting.
Green Mile, and the owners of Green Mile, should never be allowed to operate in the safari hunting industry ever again, not anywhere!