Ukhunter etal.
I am now at a computer, and can respond more in more detail.
Thanks for your input on a sport/activity [hunting] that we both feel passionate about....
Maybe we came from different cultures, countries, backgrounds or experiences in hunting, and that’s why it seems a bit odd what the other one try say....?
I will never disagree that the prey must suffer as little as possible in using ANY hunting tool during a legal hunt...
I will disagree with your statement if we talk about numbers; in that by far more animals are wounded by inexperienced, bad or unskilled [hunters?] shooters with a rifle than with a spear.[--and arrow combined!!]
Not many people worldwide practice for this very specialized discipline of 'primitive hunting' with only a spear [with or without dogs] , thus the lower numbers. Fewer still will even take the time or have the patience to hone their hunting skills to even come close enough to a wild animal to solo hunt it with a spear out in the wild. The success rate solo spear hunting without dogs like me is very, very low--all denouncing your sweeping statement of more animals are being wounded by spear than by rifle...
For sure some gremlins might take up a spear to try and impress friends/girls [for TV /YouTube-ratings/likes....?], and it could result in wounded [wild?] animals--but even more so with a rifle.
The concept of people doing stupid things out there in the wild is the same with any hunting tool, but I think more so with a rifle as it is more readily available.[also distance become less of a factor with a rifle]
I really don’t think the concept of animals suffering that you want to rise is directed towards the correct target [spears] when you put a blanket bet out in public belittling a spear or the few true [ethical] spear hunters…..
Without for example, knowing the circumstances, situation, background skill set ect,ect of this picture below, one cannot blindly state that what transpired here was ‘unethical’, only because an unusual hunting tool [spear] and uncommon animal [baboon] was involved….
If we want to talk about ballistics and compare the killing capabilities between a spear, arrow and bullet, a lot of factors need to be taken into consideration, but by just looking clinically at the wound channel for one, and the effect of that terrible and huge spear wound breaking bones while fully penetrating --- together with all the secondary internal cutting damage the spear-blade do while falling out of a running animal- , and then again judging its 'killing' properties---maybe you will then think a bit different about a spear's deadly effectiveness when used the correct way in the hands of a responsible person?
An argument could also then be made that the margins of error while hunting with the correct spear, is more lenient than with a bullet…?
I really don’t think we have an issue with each other here, just maybe a misguided perception...?
I've tried to address your two main concerns raised;
1] Suffering of spear hunted animals
2] Effectiveness and killing capabilities of a spear
[You have not raised the conditions where illegal poaching is going on, and that’s why I did not add that criminal activity into this debate]
We need to understand that there are good and bad people in the hunting arena with ALL the different hunting tools out there…
Just one last thought on another previous comment about ‘ETHICS’
Ethical hunting has NOTHING to do with the hunting tool [spear, arrow, knife, gun etc] but EVERYTHING to do with the person, his character, skills, attitude, responsibility and respect for the prey….
We need to understand each other and stand together in protecting sustainable and ethical hunting, irrespective of the tool used!