Hermes
AH member
Another really nice stock, what calibre?Another late to the party but Picked this up not too long ago. Now just to get it ready for PG.
View attachment 537221
View attachment 537222
View attachment 537223
Here's my stalkers started with the 275 and added a 9.3. Have enjoyed hunting with both. Upgraded wood on the 9.3 by previous owner, when he purchased it.
Didn't like the factory turn in mounts so now has quick detach leupolds.
They are good to carry and handle well.
Carrying a HS its a good day even if you get nothing.
here's some pics cheers Mick
left 275, right 9.3
View attachment 537307
9.3
View attachment 537306
275
View attachment 537308
Another really nice stock, what calibre?
And the majority seem to be in 275 and 9.3, I wonder if there is anyone on this forum that has the 300 win mag chambering the long heavy barrelIt’s truly amazing how many on this forum have Highland Stalkers. Marc clearly read the market correctly with these rifles. I love the rifle, and I have to admit that there’s a part of me that likes knowing my name is in the ledger of a London gun company.
I hope not! Terrible decision making on the configuration for that one IMO. No open sights on a stalking rifle?? 26” long barrel?? I can’t understand why they didn’t/don’t make one in 300 H&H!And the majority seem to be in 275 and 9.3, I wonder if there is anyone on this forum that has the 300 win mag chambering the long heavy barrel
I would say that is plenty accurate and then some for those scrub bulls and water buffalo you Aussies hunt!And she shoots, 3 rounds into 0.3" at 50 metres. Ignore the flyer on the right, that was my bad.
View attachment 534739
Yes the 300 win mag is configured poorly. And grossly overpriced. According to a guy I visited with from Gordy's, they are not selling.I hope not! Terrible decision making on the configuration for that one IMO. No open sights on a stalking rifle?? 26” long barrel?? I can’t understand why they didn’t/don’t make one in 300 H&H!
24" heavy profile barrel would have been plenty but my biggest issue is the cost, here in Australia a HS in 300 win mag with no upgrades costs more than the new DSB big game in 450 with upgrades I just ordered. Ridiculous price on the HS in 300 win mag, I can't see how they will sell.I hope not! Terrible decision making on the configuration for that one IMO. No open sights on a stalking rifle?? 26” long barrel?? I can’t understand why they didn’t/don’t make one in 300 H&H!
Very beautiful HS. Congrats!View attachment 540952
Picked up this HS today in 30-06. Will post better pics once it arrives. Need scope mount advice. Noticed several folks were using EAW. Any comments on your experiences with mounts would be appreciated.
Thank you!Very beautiful HS. Congrats!
Picked up this HS today in 30-06. Will post better pics once it arrives. Need scope mount advice. Noticed several folks were using EAW. Any comments on your experiences with mounts would be appreciated.
Thank you for the quick reply. Actually the Z6 1.7-10x42 is one of my favorites and will probably be what I use. Maybe the illuminated reticle version. This will primarily be for plains game, leopard and some local deer hunting at reasonable ranges.If you look at the pics in my previous post you will see that in one it has EAW pivot mounts and in the other Talley QDs. Both work well. The Talley’s are too low for use with a Swarovski scope. The EAW’s are just high enough for use with Swarovski optics and allow the scope to be mounted further to the rear.
I believe that I am done tinkering with scopes on this rifle. It now wears a Swarovski Z6 1.7-10 in EAW mounts. I’m not sure what your intentions are for your rifle, but that combo is spot on for my future applications.
I agree. From the pics I’ve seen hexalocks are too tall. Those leupolds look nice.Nice - congrats.
Like Mick @264 I went with the Leupold QRs. Tried Hexalocks bust found them too high and could get the scope (Z3) rearward enough. The Leupold 'Extended' rings worked well.