HookMeUpII
AH fanatic
Respectfully I have to disagree. I totally understand better glass, but I see absolutely no need for anything above 9x for a big game rifle. The 3x9 (as far as magnification) is still nearly perfect for the job. The VX5 2-10 would have my interest.
OP I would just go hunting.
I think it really depends on the scenario. If you're trying to kill an elk you've been bugling/calling all day from a ridge top 400-500, or more, yards away...yes. Being OP said he's had a great track record with it hunting elk and other NA game, stay put like you said. I tend to agree with you unless it's a really, really skilled shooter. I actually have a VX5HD 3-15 44mm on my 300WM and right now, the scope/rifle far outmatch my abilities as a shooter. It will work fine for RSA in May and I'm hoping to grow into it. The other factor is how long of a shot will you really get in Africa? Maybe in the Kalahari a long 300-500 yd shot? Once again, completely agree with you.
In the end, you're right. Military marksmen/snipers make kills at 500 yds+ with a fixed power scope in 6x like a Schmidt and Bender or Leupold.
I think in this case, OP switching out a perfectly suitable scope for something bigger/more mag/more expensive doesn't make sense. For someone really at that point of stretching the limits in an area with longer shots, maybe something like 3-15x is a better consideration.
Just my humble opinion.
You will hear less and less about Nikon scope over time because they stopped making rifle scopes. Damned shame, sine I thought they were a good value.
Plus one on the zebra!
Such good glass for the money. Really is a shame they no longer are in the market.