I just can't see how a traditional bolt action is safer, the lockup is weaker if anything. I was talking to a salesman in Sydney gun store who used to work for the Australian Army contractor and had hands on experience in servicing post combat R93s. He said they've seen a lot of them with missing bolt petals due to guns being used without any maintenance - no cleaning, no oiling, nothing. He said some of them had such amounts of dirt in them that it was surprising they worked at all but none of them blew up. He was not trying to sale me a Blaser, he reckoned they are ugly and too expensive and was a CZ fan.
Being a Blaser R8 user prior to purchase and afterwards I searched and searched but did not find any confirmed information about these guns blowing up, not saying it hasn't happened but details are not out there. Perhaps I'm missing something, and please do correct me if I am, but how does a turn bolt differ from straight pull in case of a blow up, does rotating bolt not move backwards? For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction and in a bolt action rifle that is bolt moving backwards towards the shooter.
Silly as this may sound, the only reason why I'm considering a traditional turn bolt rifle is due to aesthetics, to me there is something elegant and sleek in the look of turn bolt designs that straight pull rifles don't have.