I have heard different things so hopefully someone with better knowledge on this can shed some insight.
What was said was that the tariffs are suppose to bring in an additional 600B dollars. This money can give congress the ability to pass bigger tax cuts through reconciliation because the tax cuts are offset by the tariff revenue and will not increase the deficit.
I have also heard that tariff revenue cant be considered as part of the reconciliation.
Does anyone know, or have the statue that would allow or not allow expected tariff revenue to be considered/used in reconciliation?
I (not at all an expert) don't see a reason why the tarrifs couldn't be used to justify say income tax tax cuts tbf. It's just one tax revenue source vs another.
If the true 'tax take' from tariffs really is 600bn though, it'd have to be quite the tax cut.
600bn = $1700 a year in tax increase for every person in America. Man, woman and child. Working, retired, unemployed.
For the wealthy, it wouldn't take much of an income tax cut to make them whole again; they pay a lot in income tax, even a 1% drop covers $1.7k or so.
But for the average US family, 2 parents, 2 kids, annual household income 120k/yr, you'd need to be reducing income tax burden by 6800, or 5.7% of their gross annual salary just to break even on 'goods you can buy with your take home pay'. To remind, TOTAL income tax take from 2x 60k/yr jobs = $27k. So you'd be looking at cutting income tax by 25% at the median rate. Just to break even.
Plus of course, this new tax is quite a bit less progressive (in the finance way, not the political parlance) than current income tax structure, so for poorer families, you'd need to cut by a lot more than 25%. Down at 45,000 household income for example, the new income tax burden would need to be 0 to break even. And (sweeping, but accurate, generalization) poor people don't save, and they don't live within their means, so more of their gross annual income is spent on goods, and they're even more exposed.
For the median wage earner in America (appx 48k/annum), the tax they're paying for tariffs (assuming 600bn and $1700/person) equals roughly 1/4 of their TOTAL 2024 tax burden from all other sources... and unlike the extortionate expenses that the Biden admin incurred on a per household basis, they'll actually need to pay it (and will notice it) every time they buy goods.
I'll say this. It is quite a clever and subtle way to do some wealth redistribution if the tariffs do ultimately fund income tax cuts. I'd not be that sad about it personally, I'd be on the 'correct' side of the ledger in that scenario, as would most of us on this forum.
But I think a lot of those rural and rust belt MAGA supporters would be rather less impressed. As might the traditional, reliable R voting block (pensioners) who not only have to stretch their fixed income further to cover tariff taxes, but also now have roughly 10% less in their pension pot to draw on, AND don't see the benefits of a lower income tax threshold as they weren't paying much, if any income tax, anyway...