No, it doesn't work like that. And yes, I actually have a little experience in this, and could care less if that pisses someone off on this thread. It absolutely matters what presidents say.
I’m sure you do. Have a nice day.
No, it doesn't work like that. And yes, I actually have a little experience in this, and could care less if that pisses someone off on this thread. It absolutely matters what presidents say.
Some of this BS is totally freaking Unfreaking believable…….. the sky is falling the sky is falling…. Trump sneezed today!!!! Was that a sign for Putin to push further? Was that a sign for Z to push ahead? Oh my gosh ….. or was the sneeze a sign he has pneumonia and needs impeached? Join us again tomorrow for another episode of “As the stomach turns”……
World leaders do not "talk smack". They are not children. They represent a nations credibility. 8 Billion people on this planet are watching us right now. If we claim to be a world leader we act like a world leader.
Some of this BS is totally freaking Unfreaking believable…….. the sky is falling the sky is falling…. Trump sneezed today!!!! Was that a sign for Putin to push further? Was that a sign for Z to push ahead? Oh my gosh ….. or was the sneeze a sign he has pneumonia and needs impeached? Join us again tomorrow for another episode of “As the stomach turns”……
I am pretty calm. My life has revolved around nefarious actors the last 30 years or so. I knew exactly who he was before elected. I was never impressed or misled by his rhetoric. Takes a lot more than his twitter posts or blame shifting to prove to me he is a competent world leader with my nations best interest at heart. What bothers me more than his "smack talking" is the blind obedience displayed by a cult of MAGA cheerleaders getting back at the world that treated them unfairly at some point.Ok. Slow deep breaths.![]()
I simply find it laughable that each and every day we seem to cherry pick everything that annoys us about the man as if all combined every afternoon it would put us on the threshold of a nuclear world war……… Putin is a thug, Z is a thug, Trump is a goofball. I don’t have a problem with it at all, it just makes me chuckle. And none of this was aimed at you.There are a number of serious people with serious life experiences from different parts this country and the world commenting on this thread at the moment. I would suggest if that is a problem for you then discussing the virtues of a CRF action or the adequacy of a .375 are just a couple of clicks away.
I am pretty calm. My life has revolved around nefarious actors the last 30 years or so. I knew exactly who he was before elected. I was never impressed or misled by his rhetoric. Takes a lot more than his twitter posts or blame shifting to prove to me he is a competent world leader with my nations best interest at heart. What bothers me more than his "smack talking" is the blind obedience displayed by a cult of MAGA cheerleaders getting back at the world that treated them unfairly at some point.
I simply find it laughable that each and every day we seem to cherry pick everything that annoys us about the man as if all combined every afternoon it would put us on the threshold of a nuclear world war……… Putin is a thug, Z is a thug, Trump is a goofball. I don’t have a problem with it at all, it just makes me chuckle. And none of this was aimed at you.
That happened in Sept…
It’s not a coincidence that Trump started the “Ukraine could have avoided this war” and “Zelenskyy is responsible for this war” stuff in October…
The writing has been on the wall now for months.
Ok, agreed, he’s a goofy thug…….I am going to disagree a bit sir. If he's really believing what he's spewing about it being Ukraine's fault and trying to appease Putin? If so, Trump's as big a thug as Putin, not a goofball. Doing the right thing is always the right thing, even when it's difficult. A 'goofball' that allows bad things to happen is every bit as bad as the thug he is placating.
I missed this when originally posted but what about the election in 1864?The United States was not geographically affected by those wars. I posted this earlier.
So, let's put it in comparative terms. Imagine the United States under the same conditions. China has invaded the West Coast. We are engaged in a peer to peer ground war. China occupies 20% of the country and we are suffering roughly 4,000 - 5,000 casualties a day (proportional losses against our population vs Ukraine). Every major population center is under periodic conventional bombardment resulting in a couple of thousand civilian deaths a week. Power and water only work periodically across large swaths of the country. Two thirds of the population of California, Oregon, Washington, Arizona, and Nevada are refugees scattered through the remainder of the country. Our adversary has a population three times the size of ours to draw upon. It would impossible to hold an election in such conditions. We too, should we have the will and courage to continue to fight like the Ukrainians have, would be under martial law for the duration.
Also, Ukraine has a parliamentary system which allows far more flexibility in calling elections. For instance Britain did not hold a general election from 1935 to 1945 and even selected a new Prime Minister, Churchill, during that time without one.
Only the the northern states voted.I missed this when originally posted but what about the election in 1864?
You truly do not see the falsehoods? In short, almost everything.Looks like Gen. Kellog is over there talking to Z right now. Maybe he’s on here and can break away to offer a summation for us a little later today.
What part of Trumps statement is false?
![]()
Trump calls Ukraine's Zelenskyy a 'dictator without elections' as rift widens
President Donald Trump called a Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy as a “dictator without elections" after U.S.-Russia peace talks in Saudi Arabia.www.foxnews.com
Is “dictator” the problem?
![]()
Definition of DICTATOR
a person granted absolute emergency power; especially, history : one appointed by the senate of ancient Rome; one holding complete autocratic control : a person with unlimited governmental power; one ruling in an absolute and often oppressive way… See the full definitionwww.merriam-webster.com