Politics

[YancyW]

Respectfully, all it would take is a couple of dumb states to believe that the law would be liberalized (lessened) to open up a constitutional convention. All it would take is mainstream media to showcase some false flag or gay nightclub + school shooting and the public's perception of the 2nd amendment would shatter overnight.

Let us fight the long game with prudence and wisdom, never feeling cocky to bite off more than we can chew at once. We are winning, we will continue to win battles. If we take on everything at once we will lose the war.

Wasn't it a critique of Hannibal's generals? "Hannibal you are the best general to win a battle, but you're terrible at winning wars?"

Lets be Scipio, not Hannibal.

That has been happening for decades and general assemblies have become significantly more pro-gun during that same time.

34 states to call one and 38 states to ratify.

I understand what you are saying, but the fear of a constitutional convention shouldn't be a factor. There is no way it going to happen and the trend line on the issue has moved significantly the opposite direction for a couple decades now.

 

[John Wasmuth]

Jonathan Turley, who actually knows a bit about constitutional law, is worth reading on the subject. No one knows how the court will eventually rule, but SCOTUS will get an opportunity to review this decision. I would expect it may be coming to a head somewhere around the mid-terms - something team Trump likely carefully considered.

No, It Is Not Racist To Oppose Birthright Citizenship

Below is my column in The Hill on the recent controversy over President Donald Trump’s comments on ending birthright citizenship. The most notable criticism came from Professor Lawrence Tribe…

jonathanturley.org

Mr. Turley has forgotten more about the U.S. Constitution than most of us ever hope to learn.

 

[Tanks]

The problem with the 1986 machine gun issue is the law will probably nullify it if its pressed. That would be bad for gun owners because the PR from that would potentially result in a constitutional amendment. We'd be treading on dangerous grounds if we get to revise the 2nd amendment.

...

I think it would be bad for gun owners because the next thing you know will be a school shooting or a shooting at a protest with a machine gun. If that were to happen say goodbye to 2A and welcome to Australian style gun control and confiscation.

 

[WAB]

]][emoji6][emoji[emoji6]][emoji6]" data-quote="Doubleplay" data-source="post: 0" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch">

Did you hear the Reagan appointed judge?
BTW Your argument has been tested before.
I don’t like the amendment but the only place to amend it should be the congress.
What’s next nd amendment with XO?

I believe that the argument is over the interpretation, not the revision of the amendment. If the courts misinterpreted the amendment, it is within their peeve to correct the error.

 

[mdwest]

Jennifer Anniston was once labeled as the sexiest woman in Hollywood. Why in the hell would she hook up with a P.O.S like Obama?

She’s sorta got a lifetime history of bad decisions and break ups with well known/public figure men…

Not that I believe the rumor at all..

But if there is one hot chick in Hollywood that knows how to hook up with a famous dude and later have the relationship end badly.. it’s her..

Taylor Swift could take lessons on mishandling relationships and then blaming the man for the break up from Jennifer Aniston..

 

[Lone Star Bluegrass]

She’s sorta got a lifetime history of bad decisions and break ups with well known/public figure men…

Not that I believe the rumor at all..

But if there is one hot chick in Hollywood that knows how to hook up with a famous dude and later have the relationship end badly.. it’s her..

Taylor Swift could take lessons on mishandling relationships and then blaming the man for the break up from Jennifer Aniston..

There’s a name I never expected to see in here. Never say never, I suppose.

 

[Jeff505]

Last time I looked we are free market economy. Government should not interfere with who does business with whom or punish them because of it.
I was importing shotguns and was very happy with the service I got from BOA and never told to take my business anywhere.

If there’s one area to interfere it’s the insurance industry. They are either pulling out of certain areas or increasing premiums by 10 fold in some cases.

The insurance industry has wisely decided not to do business in areas where they loose money. The government should not be allowed to interfere. Apparently BOA is no longer gun friendly, again the government should not interfere. Bring the BOA policies into the light and let people choose with their wallets on who to do business with.