Politics

[fourfive8]

I have, regrettably, lived in California. Yes, the "Motor-Voter" law allows you to register to vote when you get a driver's license. Proof of citizenship not required.

And then you have the states that have specifically allowed the undocumented to be issued a license. And the Motor Voter law is still there. And it's not just a "California-Only" thing.

Apparently quite a few states operate this way and not just in Commifornia. WAKE UP AMERICA! It is insidious, common and it is going on in plain sight. I have posted about this before. This info even, though backed up with absolute proof has been labeled by the Dems, RINOS and complicit MSM as right wing, MAGA conspiracy election denial theory perpetrated by the Hitler reincarnate himself, Donald Trump! Even many gutless wonders in the judiciary are in on the scam. I have absolute proof in my hand, that this is one of the ways it happens. A non-citizen who is not allowed by law to vote is issued, by the state, a government photo ID or driver's license. That info is entered into the state's data base. Election officials for all elections, usually at county level, use that data base to send out mail-in ballots. The individual voter fills out the ballot, places it into a "security sleeve". The voter's name is only on the security sleeve. The voter is required to sign the sleeve next to his/her/its name. The ballot is mailed in or placed in a drop box. The county election officials compare the name and signature as it appears on the "security sleeve" against the official data base list provided by the state. Obviously those match. The name and signature on the sleeve match the state's data base listing for that individual. The ballot itself is anonymous. Bingo- the vote or selection on the ballot is counted as legit and legal having been laundered through an official state data base. That is just one way the system is being rigged and corrupted.There are others in the various forms of ballot harvesting. 2000 Mules pointed out much of that. WAKE UP!

And for those who say, "No big deal, not enough numbers to matter anyway" or some such crap talk.... I have a suggestion then. If the integrity of every single vote is not sacred or not important, you send me your ballot. I will throw it in the trash and I will tell you, looking you in the eye, "No big deal, it was just one vote so it wouldn't have mattered anyway".

 

[Boyd Brooks]

 

[Boyd Brooks]

 

[Hunt anything]

I’m also guessing that if you ask for proof of citizenship you will be called a racist so some little ol blue haired poll workers will be scared to even ask for an ID.

 

[Doubleplay]

View attachment 569164

This is a great quote in many ways.
Tells you a lot about election deniers and QAnan folks.

 

[PARA45]

Here in GA, our DL will have on the bar code if we are US citizen or not. Not sure if other states are the same.

Now, here is a story a friend told me. He is an active-duty member assigned to the base where I work. He received 3-4 mailing in ballots for GA during our last presidential election, when he is a legal resident and register voter for the state of SD. He has never register in GA, and his DL is from SD. How is that possible, and why would GA send him a mailing ballot?

 

[Hunt anything]

This is a great quote in many ways.
Tells you a lot about election deniers and QAnan folks.

Of course she is still out there saying she won the election, but has now been clarifying it with the popular vote. I guess since people are being prosecuted for questioning the election she has to clarify her statements so she won’t be prosecuted if a republican ever regains the White House. She also still said it was Russia

 

[Brent in Az]

Here in GA, our DL will have on the bar code if we are US citizen or not. Not sure if other states are the same.

Now, here is a story a friend told me. He is an active-duty member assigned to the base where I work. He received 3-4 mailing in ballots for GA during our last presidential election, when he is a legal resident and register voter for the state of SD. He has never register in GA, and his DL is from SD. How is that possible, and why would GA send him a mailing ballot?

Those extra mail in ballots were sent out by the same sleazy folks that are trying to convict Trump in Georgia for election interference.

Vote early, vote often!

 

[Red Leg]

Another brief clip that shows the way the Ukrainian war has evolved the use of drones as a battlefield interdiction weapon. In this case a squad of Russian soldiers decide to use the hulk of a BMP as a safe place to take cover. They are spotted by a Ukrainian observation drone (probably a commercial quad blade).

Were this a US recon drone, the target most likely would be serviced by an Apache in direct support firing a Maverick or as a destruction mission passed to a direct support artillery unit.

For the UA, Mavericks are not an option, and artillery ammunition typically must be reserved for more critical targets. In this case, the observer drones call for fire is answered with a second drone carrying a fragmentation explosive device, the pilot of which flies it through the door of the vehicle to detonate inside. The interior of an armored vehicle is an unfortunate place to be when something detonates inside.

This sort of attack requires a fairly sophisticated kill chain with excellent comms, and clear targeting and attack guidance.

For instance, small drones are a bit like looking at the battlefield through a soda straw further complicated by limited battery life and range. Therefore, the observation teams will be working carefully constructed search grids. Potential targets would be passed to a fire direction element which would make an assessment of available attack options and then designate the strike element - in this case an attack drone. Then the attack drone has to be successfully flown to the precise location where the target is located. That pilot makes a quick assessment how best to strike and carries out the mission. The observation drone relays back immediate BDA.

https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/17u9sho

 

[John Wasmuth]

.

 

[WAB]

Another brief clip that shows the way the Ukrainian war has evolved the use of drones as a battlefield interdiction weapon. In this case a squad of Russian soldiers decide to use the hulk of a BMP as a safe place to take cover. They are spotted by a Ukrainian observation drone (probably a commercial quad blade).

Were this a US recon drone, the target most likely would be serviced by an Apache in direct support firing a Maverick or as a destruction mission passed to a direct support artillery unit.

For the UA, Mavericks are not an option, and artillery ammunition typically must be reserved for more critical targets. In this case, the observer drones call for fire is answered with a second drone carrying a fragmentation explosive device, the pilot of which flies it through the door of the vehicle to detonate inside. The interior of an armored vehicle is an unfortunate place to be when something detonates inside.

This sort of attack requires a fairly sophisticated kill chain with excellent comms, and clear targeting and attack guidance.

For instance, small drones are a bit like looking at the battlefield through a soda straw further complicated by limited battery life and range. Therefore, the observation teams will be working carefully constructed search grids. Potential targets would be passed to a fire direction element which would make an assessment of available attack options and then designate the strike element - in this case an attack drone. Then the attack drone has to be successfully flown to the precise location where the target is located. That pilot makes a quick assessment how best to strike and carries out the mission. The observation drone relays back immediate BDA.

https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/17u9sho

That’s incredible!

 

[PARA45]

Another brief clip that shows the way the Ukrainian war has evolved the use of drones as a battlefield interdiction weapon. In this case a squad of Russian soldiers decide to use the hulk of a BMP as a safe place to take cover. They are spotted by a Ukrainian observation drone (probably a commercial quad blade).

Were this a US recon drone, the target most likely would be serviced by an Apache in direct support firing a Maverick or as a destruction mission passed to a direct support artillery unit.

For the UA, Mavericks are not an option, and artillery ammunition typically must be reserved for more critical targets. In this case, the observer drones call for fire is answered with a second drone carrying a fragmentation explosive device, the pilot of which flies it through the door of the vehicle to detonate inside. The interior of an armored vehicle is an unfortunate place to be when something detonates inside.

This sort of attack requires a fairly sophisticated kill chain with excellent comms, and clear targeting and attack guidance.

For instance, small drones are a bit like looking at the battlefield through a soda straw further complicated by limited battery life and range. Therefore, the observation teams will be working carefully constructed search grids. Potential targets would be passed to a fire direction element which would make an assessment of available attack options and then designate the strike element - in this case an attack drone. Then the attack drone has to be successfully flown to the precise location where the target is located. That pilot makes a quick assessment how best to strike and carries out the mission. The observation drone relays back immediate BDA.

https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/17u9sho

Wow, that is scary! Somehow one soldier seems to have survived the attack.

 

[DillonG]

 

[Hunt anything]

@DillonG, Your trying to find logic in the extreme liberal mind, it ain’t happening!

 

[Doubleplay]

View attachment 569186

One of the most unrelated comparisons I've seen in a long time. LOL

 

[Doubleplay]

Another brief clip that shows the way the Ukrainian war has evolved the use of drones as a battlefield interdiction weapon. In this case a squad of Russian soldiers decide to use the hulk of a BMP as a safe place to take cover. They are spotted by a Ukrainian observation drone (probably a commercial quad blade).

Were this a US recon drone, the target most likely would be serviced by an Apache in direct support firing a Maverick or as a destruction mission passed to a direct support artillery unit.

For the UA, Mavericks are not an option, and artillery ammunition typically must be reserved for more critical targets. In this case, the observer drones call for fire is answered with a second drone carrying a fragmentation explosive device, the pilot of which flies it through the door of the vehicle to detonate inside. The interior of an armored vehicle is an unfortunate place to be when something detonates inside.

This sort of attack requires a fairly sophisticated kill chain with excellent comms, and clear targeting and attack guidance.

For instance, small drones are a bit like looking at the battlefield through a soda straw further complicated by limited battery life and range. Therefore, the observation teams will be working carefully constructed search grids. Potential targets would be passed to a fire direction element which would make an assessment of available attack options and then designate the strike element - in this case an attack drone. Then the attack drone has to be successfully flown to the precise location where the target is located. That pilot makes a quick assessment how best to strike and carries out the mission. The observation drone relays back immediate BDA.

https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/17u9sho

Nicely done!

 

[DillonG]

One of the most unrelated comparisons I've seen in a long time. LOL

I’m pretty salty. Courts are screwing over IL citizens with the midnight gun ban by our Oompa Loompa of a governor. Not only are basically all semi automatics outlawed, but now I have to register all of those firearms with the state. Gee I wonder what will happen next?

Confiscation. Tag this one so in a couple years I can say, “Told you so.”

 

[DillonG]

One more for the road.

 

[Wheels]

 

[Red Leg]

This is a great quote in many ways.
Tells you a lot about election deniers and QAnan folks.

But to cut to the primary point. It is hardly a QAnan fantasy that Hillary does get a complete pass from the press for saying that the election of 2016 was stolen from her by an "illegitimate" president. And of course those democrats objecting to electors in 2016 have never been accused or pursued by DOJ for attempting to overthrow a legitimate transfer of power.

I will be the first to admit that the riot on January 6 added a very different context to the election of 2020, but that does not alter the observation that fundamental election denial accusations seem to only be applicable to Republicans.