Politics

You must be living sheltered life. Happens all the time. This “new” weed is different. It’s no longer the munchies and relaxed.
Well you’re a judge if I remember correctly, so you deal with the negative outcomes of society. But I’d hazard a guess you see plenty of booze related issues as well.

As for sheltered? Maybe, but I’m also under 40 and have been around is since I was probably 14. And I can say I don’t recall anyone spoiling for trouble after a joint, but any given weekend I could pick out someone going Indian after getting on the whiskey.

I would also bet that a good chunk of issues arising are from laced weed, or starting with a joint and moving on to something else.

“I swear I only smoked a joint your honour” is akin to “I promise dear, I only had two drinks.”

Anyway, all I’m saying is people choosing to forego vices whether it be booze, smokes, drugs, McDonald’s, etc in a broad generalization a net positive.
 
McCarthy, will lead another "do nothing" Republican congress.
I'm tired of the " rank & file" swamp rats being in charge.
More dog & pony show investigations, with nothing ever coming out of it but political theater.

Nauseating.
This right here.

Until the Republicans learn how to unite and work together like that other party they will get nothing done.
 
1672807074724.png
 
1672808468116.png
 
Well, long before whisky there was beer. The ancient Egyptians brewed it. In Europe and many other places around the world during the Medieval times, the water was so contaminated by humans it was unsafe to drink. So, they brewed beer which killed the viruses and bacteria in the water. Later, distilled spirits emerged as they got tired of drinking beer. LOL
 
I’m pretty sure if you tally the percentage of social/health issues attributed to alcohol, you could build a much better business case for banning booze as opposed to guns.
I'm pretty sure we tried that once...
 
Last edited:
The marijuana of today is very, very potent and its use is accepted by some. Teenage drug use is up 250% and causing any number of big problems in our society. It’s a freaking $h*t show. So glad I got my kids past their teenage years before this got going much! I fear for my grandchildren now.
 
There are no altruistic or unselfish actions taken on the Hill. This is not about Gaetz or his posse trying to do the "right" thing or uphold some sort of broad conservative ideals (to which everyone to include Romney generally support - ok likely not term limits - but no congressman really supports that). This all about creating a power block that can potentially control Republican majority actions in the House - with Gaetz as its leader. A block that he also can potentially leverage at the national electoral level.

So, in your opinion, every one of these House Republicans that has gone against the grain of the Republican establishment, questioned the U.S.'s unlimited support for the Ukraine war, or is now voting against McCarthy is either stupid, a grifter, or has a selfish agenda? There is no chance that any of these 20 House members are not acting in self-interest but actually representing the constituency that elected them to oppose the status quo in D.C...? And, Isn't that, by definition, the practice of real democracy?

I found it particularly interesting that Byron Donalds, my Congressman for the 19th District here in SW Florida, voted for McCarthy in the first two rounds then changed his vote to oppose McCarthy in the 3rd round. I cannot speak for the other 19, but I do have some personal insight into Representative Donalds who I can tell you first-hand is neither stupid, nor a grifter. This is an extremely intelligent, very sincere, very well-spoken individual who also happens to be a black man who was elected from a primary field of 9 in an overwhelmingly white district with a black population of only 7%. I have campaigned for Donalds and had the privilege to speak with him personally on many occasions. The last time we spoke it was in the aftermath of Hurricane Ian where I ran into Donalds with a chainsaw in hand clearing roads and handing out ice, food, & water to hurricane victims. And not for a 10 minute photo op, but for 8-10 hours a day for several days.. You know, doing the the typical stupid grifter/obstructionist/self-serving political agenda kind of stuff that establishment politicians do.. If he's a grifter with a self-serving agenda, I'll take 400 more of him in Congress.

These 20 hold-outs are not obstructionists. They are patriots that are sending a message to the establishment that the status quo of false conservatism and capitulation to the left is no longer acceptable (at least to their constituents). Of course it's a stunt, but a necessary one in my view. Hopefully the message will be heard by McCarthy and the rest of the soft republicans and not fall on the deaf ears of all the real idiots, grifters, and obstructionists who have the gall to call themselves conservatives.
 
Well you’re a judge if I remember correctly, so you deal with the negative outcomes of society. But I’d hazard a guess you see plenty of booze related issues as well.

As for sheltered? Maybe, but I’m also under 40 and have been around is since I was probably 14. And I can say I don’t recall anyone spoiling for trouble after a joint, but any given weekend I could pick out someone going Indian after getting on the whiskey.

I would also bet that a good chunk of issues arising are from laced weed, or starting with a joint and moving on to something else.

“I swear I only smoked a joint your honour” is akin to “I promise dear, I only had two drinks.”

Anyway, all I’m saying is people choosing to forego vices whether it be booze, smokes, drugs, McDonald’s, etc in a broad generalization a net positive.
Your right I see more negative outcome than most. When I was in college 40 years ago, get some weed and rolling paper and smoke you were hungry and and sleepy. Today, weed with high THC level it's a bowl of buds folks are becoming psychotic. You are right with other drugs, especially synthetic weed and Meth, they go crazy. I have seen and sentenced DWI cases both Felony and thousands of misdemeanor. Booze is a problem, however the vast majority of first time DWI don't reoffend or least don't get caught. Those that do, continue on to felony level DWI. Generally when you get to the "Second" or "Third or More (a felony)" or you have a high number (.15 or higher), some require folks to attend a 12 step program and require a sponsor. I've been to several open AA meetings, and the majority of those there have mental heath problems, and booze/drugs is simply the means to mask the problem. We have a real mental health crisis in the USA that does not get addressed and folks just end up self-medicating with booze or drugs or both. Just look at the majority of the homeless on the streets.
 
So, in your opinion, every one of these House Republicans that has gone against the grain of the Republican establishment, questioned the U.S.'s unlimited support for the Ukraine war, or is now voting against McCarthy is either stupid, a grifter, or has a selfish agenda? There is no chance that any of these 20 House members are not acting in self-interest but actually representing the constituency that elected them to oppose the status quo in D.C...? And, Isn't that, by definition, the practice of real democracy?

I found it particularly interesting that Byron Donalds, my Congressman for the 19th District here in SW Florida, voted for McCarthy in the first two rounds then changed his vote to oppose McCarthy in the 3rd round. I cannot speak for the other 19, but I do have some personal insight into Representative Donalds who I can tell you first-hand is neither stupid, nor a grifter. This is an extremely intelligent, very sincere, very well-spoken individual who also happens to be a black man who was elected from a primary field of 9 in an overwhelmingly white district with a black population of only 7%. I have campaigned for Donalds and had the privilege to speak with him personally on many occasions. The last time we spoke it was in the aftermath of Hurricane Ian where I ran into Donalds with a chainsaw in hand clearing roads and handing out ice, food, & water to hurricane victims. And not for a 10 minute photo op, but for 8-10 hours a day for several days.. You know, doing the the typical stupid grifter/obstructionist/self-serving political agenda kind of stuff that establishment politicians do.. If he's a grifter with a self-serving agenda, I'll take 400 more of him in Congress.

These 20 hold-outs are not obstructionists. They are patriots that are sending a message to the establishment that the status quo of false conservatism and capitulation to the left is no longer acceptable (at least to their constituents). Of course it's a stunt, but a necessary one in my view. Hopefully the message will be heard by McCarthy and the rest of the soft republicans and not fall on the deaf ears of all the real idiots, grifters, and obstructionists who have the gall to call themselves conservatives.
Republicans now view Reagan while wearing rose-colored glasses. They only remember the smile and optimism. In 1976 Reagan primaried Gerald Ford. You want to piss off Republican leadership in Washington, come within an inch of beating the incumbent Republican president in a primary. Washington politicians loathed Reagan. They hated him and everything he stood for. He stood for their removal from power. For them getting out of the way of a truly American agenda.

We need leadership that will FIGHT for every inch. We need constant, consistent, consise, clear messaging from our republican leadership. Messaging can never stop, even when you get something you want.

Current leadership cares about one thing and one thing only. MONEY. They have proven to not give a flying F about anything else.
 
Republicans now view Reagan while wearing rose-colored glasses. They only remember the smile and optimism. In 1976 Reagan primaried Gerald Ford. You want to piss off Republican leadership in Washington, come within an inch of beating the incumbent Republican president in a primary. Washington politicians loathed Reagan. They hated him and everything he stood for. He stood for their removal from power. For them getting out of the way of a truly American agenda.

We need leadership that will FIGHT for every inch. We need constant, consistent, consise, clear messaging from our republican leadership. Messaging can never stop, even when you get something you want.

Current leadership cares about one thing and one thing only. MONEY. They have proven to not give a flying F about anything else.

I remember the Reagan era all too well and the opposition he faced by the establishment then. I completely agree with your assessment. The current establishment is unfortunately alive and well once again. It is toxic and will certainly be the end of this republic if drastic change does not occur.
 
The Republicans can't even win when they win. I don't like any Dem policies, but I must grudgingly admit that they are far more cohesive and better organised than the GOP.

The optics aren't great but at this point I am not overly concerned about the vote.

IMO, The Republican's haven't had a Speaker or minority leader that was proactive with a plan since 1999. McCarthy falls into the same category. The fact that McCarthy came into this Congress without the votes to become speaker shows how inept he will be as speaker. How much worse will he perform against the Democrats if he can't even figure a way to keep the Republican's together.

The fact that McCarthy moved into the Speakers office before becoming speaker shows an un leaderlike level of hubris and obtuseness.

I am not a fan of Scalise. Jordan would be fine but probably won't get it. I don't know enough about Stefanik or others.

If McCarthy becomes speaker, he will have earned it. At this point it is obvious he hasn't earned it yet. We will see what today holds.
 
Last edited:

Forum statistics

Threads
57,665
Messages
1,236,935
Members
101,585
Latest member
fireplacesandstove3586
 

 

 

Latest posts

 
Top