If they are able to raid it, it IS a Ponzi scheme. Corporations were prohibited from screwing with retirement programs, until Uncle Sam showed them the light. Even poor Chileans have a great retirement with their social security program, because it cannot be raided. Who is kidding who?I take exception to the post re Social Security being a Ponzi scheme. It is true that those near retirement age when it was initiated benefitted more than the amount they had paid into it; however as initially set it would have been self-funding. The problem is that same as with any government program that has cash on hand- politicians find a place to spend it in their never-ending pursuit to claim voters' loyalty. With a fund that was flush with cash politicians expanded the Social Security Administration to include all sorts of welfare, housing subsidies- you name it and the govt would pay for it under one of the SSA's several Titles- particularly with those politicians who are career politicians.
Free pending appeal.Steve Bannon sentenced to 4 months in prison for contempt of congress.
What is the statue of limitations on contempt? I'm asking for Eric Holder.
We wouldn't be in this position, if the Republican leadership wasn't spineless, and castrated.
The Judges are corrupt, and Democrat cronies. Winning an appeal is highly unlikelyFree pending appeal