Politics

I feel sorry for the young folks trying to buy their first home and make mortgage payments. It’s a good time to be out of debt, retired, and living on a self sustaining farm. I hope the morons who voted for these jokers all go broke.
Actually, those who buy property now, with a fixed interest rate, in the case of inflation, would be much better off (as long as they can still purchase other basic life necessities of course). Granted, once inflation does kick in, it will be too late to make such investments. But now is still the time. (it is what I did btw, a fixed 1.27% interest rate on 25years)
 

The problem with those that are moving out of New York and California is that they are bringing their fail political opinions with them to their new state. I would suspect that Texas in the next few years will be a blue state unless something changes. Idaho and Montana are both quickly changing. Just look at Colorado, a number of years ago it was a Red state and now it has turned blue all the way.
 
The problem with those that are moving out of New York and California is that they are bringing their fail political opinions with them to their new state. I would suspect that Texas in the next few years will be a blue state unless something changes. Idaho and Montana are both quickly changing. Just look at Colorado, a number of years ago it was a Red state and now it has turned blue all the way.
Funny you should bring that up.

In Texas, we haven't had a democrat in statewide office since 1994, I think.

In California, they haven't had a republican hold statewide office since about 1990 or 1992 (does Ahnold really count???)

Those Californians, New Yorkers, et al seem to be an incredibly incurious bunch, never questioning the cause of their respective states turning into shitholes compelling them to leave for more prosperous states like Texas and Florida, nor understanding/questioning why states like Texas and Florida are prospering to such a great degree.
 
When the laws of physics are violated, the results are frequently spectacular and often immediate.

When the laws of economics are violated, the results are chaos and often take months or years or even decades to be observed. Thus many people seem to be OK with it because it's not like a stick of dynamite is blowing up in your hand. Or worse, they believe that since the consequences aren't immediate, or are "good" in the very near term, that there will be no long-term bad consequences. So we just keep getting more of it.
Good take on this! Yes, we have very short memories of disasters, financial or otherwise, here in the US. We as citizens, and our elected officials, tend to make the same mistakes over and over again, while disregarding the past. This is the result of either disregarding (cancel culture) or just not paying attention to history. Citizens who weren't born yet or politicians who weren't in office when these past disasters took place, don't/won't look to the past to see what caused that particular chaos to occur and learn from those crises. Sleepy/Covid/China Joe has NO excuse. He's been through multiple financial and other disasters since he was elected to Congress in 1974. Just as then, he has NO IDEA how to solve ANYTHING! He's a talking head, who sticks with the failed Democratic solutions of the past. He's another Jimmy Carter and both were only elected by default. Carter, only because President Ford pardoned Nixon and Bidetron because of the pandemic. The peanut farmer's solution to soaring energy prices was "carpool and/or don't drive as much". When people complained they couldn't afford to heat their homes, Carter and his wife Rosalynn were sitting in the White House with their sweaters on, urging Americans to turn down their thermostats to save energy. Again, he had no solutions for anything affecting Americans here at home or abroad.
 
Does anyone have any idea how the dems go soft on crime drive will improve things? What exactly is supposed to happen - criminals eventually get everything they want and say enough? Or they develop a concience? I just don't get it - what am I missing?
 
Does anyone have any idea how the dems go soft on crime drive will improve things? What exactly is supposed to happen - criminals eventually get everything they want and say enough? Or they develop a concience? I just don't get it - what am I missing?
They are buying voters (criminals) while making a reason (excuse -increased crime) to confiscate firearms from law abiding citizens.
 
The confiscating guns argument makes sense, but surely they won't buy any votes because the victims, which probably outnumber the criminals will vote against the dems. There seems to be a dem backlash against the crime spree in California already.
 
Does anyone have any idea how the dems go soft on crime drive will improve things? What exactly is supposed to happen - criminals eventually get everything they want and say enough? Or they develop a concience? I just don't get it - what am I missing?
Here's the way it was explained to me. The DA's and police in the big cities know who are the drug dealers, the habitual criminals and general bad actors. There aren't enough jail cells to incarcerate all of them and if they did and crime went down, these cities would lose FEDERAL FUNDING for a host of law enforcement programs. In other words, there would need to be a massive layoff in their criminal justice system apparatus, i.e. police, social workers, judges, bailiffs, prison employees and all the attendant personnel. The district attorneys plea bargain criminals' offenses for lighter sentences so they're quickly back on the street committing more crimes. The crime rate goes up and the politicians lobby for more money to fight crime. It's a profitable and vote getting method for the Democrats that run these cities. Ironic, the taxpayers have been throwing money down these shithole big cities since LBJ initiated the "War on Poverty" and little to nothing has changed.
 
The confiscating guns argument makes sense, but surely they won't buy any votes because the victims, which probably outnumber the criminals will vote against the dems. There seems to be a dem backlash against the crime spree in California already.
You'd think so, but the moron voters in Californicate voted recently NOT to recall their Governor Newsome. They need to stay there and suffer their voting consequences. But many won't. They'll move east like locusts and devour other states through their left wing voting choices. Even the Rocky Mts. wasn't enough of a barrier and we see the results here in what is becoming Colocalifornicate.
 
I'm all for saving the Eagles but you can
have to many of them. They will kill baby lambs and goats and fully capable of getting a baby calf. The animal rights nut cases will run the protection into the ground. Wait and see.
 
@Kevin Peacocke In the U.S., a convicted felon generally isn't allowed to own a firearm yet most crimes with a gun are committed by a previously convicted felon. Obviously laws didn't stop them from acquiring a firearm and won't again. The DAs plea bargain away the possession of a firearm by a felon charge for a lighter one so they can go back on the street, get another gun and commit additional crimes (more federal funding!). If the sentence was strong enough and the DAs made the gun charge stick, these repeat offenders would be off the street. The problem is more gun crime fits the anti-gun / tougher gun laws narrative and they'd have to build more prisons. The result would be more taxes or tax money directed away from social programs and giveaways (read votes). If anyone thinks this is BS, suggest they check on the major cities in the U.S. that had record homicides and other gun crimes in 2021. Philadelphia, up the road from my home, was one of them. OT, the first five minutes of every evening news program there is how many were shot and killed overnight or during the day.
 
Surely the dems can't be that stupid that they elect officials whose policies will directly harm them?
I am trying to understand how dems think and reason. So what is this magic thing that the dem voters, not the officials (i get what you have said about the funding rationale) are hoping will happen? What is the goal of their experiment? @Saul, where are you to help us to understand this?
 
Surely the dems can't be that stupid that they elect officials whose policies will directly harm them?
I am trying to understand how dems think and reason. So what is this magic thing that the dem voters, not the officials (i get what you have said about the funding rationale) are hoping will happen? What is the goal of their experiment? @Saul, where are you to help us to understand this?
Unfortunately, it seems they’ve already proven their ability and willingness to do just that.
 
They are buying voters (criminals) while making a reason (excuse -increased crime) to confiscate firearms from law abiding citizens.

There is a different evolving perspective that I think is very interesting. Basically, the educated "woke" affluent elite are the market. I am very interested to watch this conversation as it develops. This reporter left the CBC because she felt these influences are distorting journalism and democracy. She seems to be exposing an important issue.

 
BD1A573D-D166-4DB2-8EAF-FF683672AB07.jpeg
 
Surely the dems can't be that stupid that they elect officials whose policies will directly harm them?
I am trying to understand how dems think and reason. So what is this magic thing that the dem voters, not the officials (i get what you have said about the funding rationale) are hoping will happen? What is the goal of their experiment? @Saul, where are you to help us to understand this?
Kevin, one word comes to mind, Sheep. I am not saying all of them are, but the big majority are sheep.
Blindly following the herd where their Herder is steering them. (Down the drain and not greener pastures)
 
Kevin, one word comes to mind, Sheep. I am not saying all of them are, but the big majority are sheep.
Blindly following the herd where their Herder is steering them. (Down the drain and not greener pastures)
Jorg, it seems as if rather than aspire to get humanity to a higher level where honesty, hard work and dilligence are hallmarks they have decided to drag everything down to a base lower level that is chaos, stealing and violence. And then join the mele down there. The saving of America will be that the vast majority of the normal folks, including the immigrants will reject this. That is what they are trying to escape.
 
DC7C9766-9849-4DA0-AAF3-501DD87B7984.jpeg
 
Does anyone have any idea how the dems go soft on crime drive will improve things? What exactly is supposed to happen - criminals eventually get everything they want and say enough? Or they develop a concience? I just don't get it - what am I missing?
Your first mistake is believing the Dems are even trying to do something beneficial for The People.
 
Surely the dems can't be that stupid that they elect officials whose policies will directly harm them?
I am trying to understand how dems think and reason. So what is this magic thing that the dem voters, not the officials (i get what you have said about the funding rationale) are hoping will happen? What is the goal of their experiment? @Saul, where are you to help us to understand this?
The Dems keep the free (at other's expense) stuff coming and that gets votes.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
58,770
Messages
1,269,750
Members
105,867
Latest member
KristanPil
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

Out of all the different color variations of Impala the black Impala just stands out with its beautiful pitch black hide.

Impala is one of the animals you will see all over Africa.
You can see them in herds of a 100 plus together.

This excellent ram was taken with one of our previous client this past season.

Contact us at Elite hunting outfitters to help you make your African safari dream come true..
updated available dates for 2025 season,

14-19 March
1-4 April
22-28 April
9-30 June
25-31 July
September and October is wide open

Thank you for the bookings Gents headed to USA soon get your dates booked they are going quick!
 
Top