Perfect Rifle Balance?

[Papa72]

Is there such a thing or is rifle balance just a matter of preference? In 60 years of firearms ownership and hunting I have never considered balance to be a factor worth investigating, much less actually modifying. I am now interested in helping my 9.37# .458 WM adopt a more sympathetic approach to elder abuse and would appreciate opinions on the “perfect” balance point and how much modifying CG will affect recoil. Currently, my rifle’s CG is 7-3/8” in front of the trigger or just slightly forward of the front action screw on this M98 action rifle.

 

[colorado]

I like my rifles to balance at the middle of the floor plate.

 

[Papa72]

I like my rifles to balance at the middle of the floor plate.

I was thinking of adding some weight or a recoil reducer in the butt so that would move the CG to where you suggest. I realize the weight alone will help with felt recoil but am curious how much CG needs to be a factor when selecting how much weight to add?

 

[colorado]

Even though my 500 Jeffery weighs 12 lbs with scope unloaded, because of the balance point it feels light and lively in my hands and points well too.

 

[Papa72]

Great info, thanks. Middle of floorplate as a target point it will be.

 

[MS 9x56]

I am a still hunter and rifle ballance is critical to a quick mount with sights aligned. But in my humble opinion rifle ballance point has no affect whatsoever on felt recoil. Stock fit and conformation certainly does. Example my CZ 550 FS in 9.3x62 felt recoil with 286 grain bullet is much less than my Ruger American 30-06 with a 180 grain load. I believe it is due to the unbent stick conformation of the synthetic stock compared to the Bavarian slope of the CZ stock. Point of fact the CZ is 2.5 lbs heavier which is also a factor. I would much rather shoot 20 rounds through the CZ than 20 through the Ruger.

 

[poco]

I was thinking of adding some weight or a recoil reducer in the butt so that would move the CG to where you suggest. I realize the weight alone will help with felt recoil but am curious how much CG needs to be a factor when selecting how much weight to add?

I started with a 1lbs and finished with 1.5 lbs in the forward section of the butt of the stock , differences was 15lbs of recoil, from 60 to 45
A neoprene cheek pad and change in butt pad helps me too

 

[Clodo Ferreira]

Hi,

More than the "balance point" I would think about the distribution of the rifle weight. Two rifles can have the same balance point but the weight distribution very diferent. For a hunting rifle I like the weight "between the hands". When you find a rifle with that configuration is a joy to handle!

 

[Woodcarver]

I have 2, 9.3x62s. One is a pleasure to shoot, the other, well, it's not a pleasure. Both weigh right at 9lb. The CZ550 has the weight fairly evenly distributed, and as Clodo spoke to, the weight is even "between the hands". The VZ24 on the other hand, is very light in the front. The weight sits on the right hand on the wrist, and the muzzle rise is atrocious; a beast to shoot, especially if a quick followup were needed.
I do find that the heavier the recoil, the more forward I prefer the balance point or weight distribution. My 458 Lott, for instance, is very easy to shoot as it is slightly muzzle heavy, balancing at the front of the floor plate, whereas the 375H&H in the same model is balanced at the rear of the floor plate and equally easy to shoot. The Lott does weigh 1.5lb more than the 375. I'd rather shoot my Lott than the VZ24 in 9.3.

 

[BlueFlyer]

the muzzle rise is atrocious;

Are the stocks essentually the same design?