Opinions on best solid for .458 Lott...

shuter

AH enthusiast
Joined
Nov 5, 2014
Messages
365
Reaction score
219
Website
www.roboliveauthor.com
Media
16
Hunted
Oregon, Montana
What's the thinking of those with experience using solids in the Lott? I know about monometal solids, flat point solids, cup point solids, "traditional" Woodleigh-type solids, Hornady DGS, etc. Is monometal the way to go? Do flat points penetrate and kill better?

By the way, this would be to use to work up a load capable of taking on anything up to and including elephant.

Thanks in advance, gents!
 
The solids that I read about, note not having direct experience with, that give the deepest and most straight line penetration on are the CEB and North Fork flat point solids. Being flat point however is not just the only consideration, the shoulder angle is also part of the equation.

This does not mean that round nose solids have never killed anything or that you will most certainly die if you use them. It's simply that what I've read from independent testing is that the those solids mentioned perform the best.
 
So I emailed North Fork tonight to verify that their 500 grain FPS solid is the best choice for the Lott. Their website says its meant for 2,100-2,400 fps and recommends the 450 grain FPS for the .458 win mag. I load the Lott to between 2,150-2,200 (not far above modern .458 WM ballistics) and wondered if the 450 would be better. Lo and behold, ten minutes after I sent the email, at 10:30 PM Kansas time, I received a reply from Franz at North Fork! Very impressive, to say the least. He said that the 500 grain FPS would be perfect for my application and should offer awesome penetration.

North Fork gained a customer tonight!
 
So I emailed North Fork tonight to verify that their 500 grain FPS solid is the best choice for the Lott. Their website says its meant for 2,100-2,400 fps and recommends the 450 grain FPS for the .458 win mag. I load the Lott to between 2,150-2,200 (not far above modern .458 WM ballistics) and wondered if the 450 would be better. Lo and behold, ten minutes after I sent the email, at 10:30 PM Kansas time, I received a reply from Franz at North Fork! Very impressive, to say the least. He said that the 500 grain FPS would be perfect for my application and should offer awesome penetration.

North Fork gained a customer tonight!

Not surprising, Franz and the other gents there are good folks. The guys there are engineers by day at their 'normal' jobs and then work in the evenings at North Fork. It's been awhile now, but when I first started working with their bullets I spent a number of hours on the phone with them discussing bullets. If you ever make your way to DSC, they have a booth there and you can meet them.
 
Not surprising, Franz and the other gents there are good folks. The guys there are engineers by day at their 'normal' jobs and then work in the evenings at North Fork. It's been awhile now, but when I first started working with their bullets I spent a number of hours on the phone with them discussing bullets. If you ever make your way to DSC, they have a booth there and you can meet them.
Wow, so North Fork isn't a full-time gig for them? They sure make great stuff!
 
Wow, so North Fork isn't a full-time gig for them? They sure make great stuff!

The "factory" part of the shop is running during the day manufacturing bullets. But the engineering is done at night. Those guys are also shooters and hunters and decided to combine their mechanical engineering skills with their passion for hunting.

Yep, I do love their bonded core bullets. All of the bullets I've recovered were text book examples of how their advertised to work. I've not worked with the solids yet, but plan to when the time for a DG hunt arises.

I do think the A-Frames from a terminal ballistics point of view are virtually the equal of the NF bonded cores. But even though the A-Frames are shorter, they typically for me have required more powder to achieve the same velocities. I've also found the NF's easier to develop a load for, perhaps just one person's experience however.

The only drawback I find to using the NF bullets is that they're true diameter for the caliber. If you measure say a .308 NF bullet, it is truly .308, whereas another bullet may be .306-.307. Why is this a drawback? It makes the NF bullets less tolerant to uneven neck thickness. When first working with their bullets in my .300WM and my son's .308 Win, I'd find that roughly every 4th shot would be a flyer. Discussed this with Franz in Dallas and he figured it was my brass. The solution was to either turn my necks or buy better brass. I chose the latter and use either Lapua or Norma brass in the medium calibers. Once I made that change, no more flyers.

By the way this problem only seems to be in the smaller calibers. In my .375H&H I've not seen this problem and use Remington brass. So hopefully this won't be an issue in your Lott.
 
The "factory" part of the shop is running during the day manufacturing bullets. But the engineering is done at night. Those guys are also shooters and hunters and decided to combine their mechanical engineering skills with their passion for hunting.

Yep, I do love their bonded core bullets. All of the bullets I've recovered were text book examples of how their advertised to work. I've not worked with the solids yet, but plan to when the time for a DG hunt arises.

I do think the A-Frames from a terminal ballistics point of view are virtually the equal of the NF bonded cores. But even though the A-Frames are shorter, they typically for me have required more powder to achieve the same velocities. I've also found the NF's easier to develop a load for, perhaps just one person's experience however.

The only drawback I find to using the NF bullets is that they're true diameter for the caliber. If you measure say a .308 NF bullet, it is truly .308, whereas another bullet may be .306-.307. Why is this a drawback? It makes the NF bullets less tolerant to uneven neck thickness. When first working with their bullets in my .300WM and my son's .308 Win, I'd find that roughly every 4th shot would be a flyer. Discussed this with Franz in Dallas and he figured it was my brass. The solution was to either turn my necks or buy better brass. I chose the latter and use either Lapua or Norma brass in the medium calibers. Once I made that change, no more flyers.

By the way this problem only seems to be in the smaller calibers. In my .375H&H I've not seen this problem and use Remington brass. So hopefully this won't be an issue in your Lott.
Great info, Phil! Thanks so much for taking the time to respond in such detail.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
65,500
Messages
1,445,829
Members
136,485
Latest member
DrusillaBu
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

Made it to Augusta Georgia yesterday for a meeting, hunt bookings are looking good for 2026 and 2027, had a great time on our Alabama safari shot a rutting deer at 200 yards with 7mm PRC near Huntsville and then headed on to Butler Alabama and semi guided my first deer ever shot a very nice broken off 8 point with hunter there and spend a few days on 1100 acres hunting preserve awesome place!
Ray B wrote on JMJ888's profile.
I am righthanded, so not interested in the rifle, but I have a 375 RUM and 350 gr bullet loading data is very hard to come by. If you could reply with information regarding your loads I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you, Ray Boone, Leavenworth, WA
mcr wrote on gbflyer's profile.
Hello - I was looking at your post from several years ago regarding the Winchester 300 H&H. Any chance you still have the lefty M70 300 H&H for sale?
Thank you, Mike
'68boy wrote on Rare Breed's profile.
Wife and I will attend ah dinner in Nashville Friday night. Jay Sheets and wife Chris
crossfire3006 wrote on Hornedfrogbbq's profile.
An excellent AH member right here! I had a fantastic transaction with Hornedfrogbbq (I was the seller). His communication was first rate, payment was extremely fast, and I would have absolutely no reservations at all dealing with him again. Thank you, F!
 
Top