Opinions on best solid for .458 Lott...

shuter

AH enthusiast
Joined
Nov 5, 2014
Messages
365
Reaction score
219
Website
www.roboliveauthor.com
Media
16
Hunted
Oregon, Montana
What's the thinking of those with experience using solids in the Lott? I know about monometal solids, flat point solids, cup point solids, "traditional" Woodleigh-type solids, Hornady DGS, etc. Is monometal the way to go? Do flat points penetrate and kill better?

By the way, this would be to use to work up a load capable of taking on anything up to and including elephant.

Thanks in advance, gents!
 
The solids that I read about, note not having direct experience with, that give the deepest and most straight line penetration on are the CEB and North Fork flat point solids. Being flat point however is not just the only consideration, the shoulder angle is also part of the equation.

This does not mean that round nose solids have never killed anything or that you will most certainly die if you use them. It's simply that what I've read from independent testing is that the those solids mentioned perform the best.
 
So I emailed North Fork tonight to verify that their 500 grain FPS solid is the best choice for the Lott. Their website says its meant for 2,100-2,400 fps and recommends the 450 grain FPS for the .458 win mag. I load the Lott to between 2,150-2,200 (not far above modern .458 WM ballistics) and wondered if the 450 would be better. Lo and behold, ten minutes after I sent the email, at 10:30 PM Kansas time, I received a reply from Franz at North Fork! Very impressive, to say the least. He said that the 500 grain FPS would be perfect for my application and should offer awesome penetration.

North Fork gained a customer tonight!
 
So I emailed North Fork tonight to verify that their 500 grain FPS solid is the best choice for the Lott. Their website says its meant for 2,100-2,400 fps and recommends the 450 grain FPS for the .458 win mag. I load the Lott to between 2,150-2,200 (not far above modern .458 WM ballistics) and wondered if the 450 would be better. Lo and behold, ten minutes after I sent the email, at 10:30 PM Kansas time, I received a reply from Franz at North Fork! Very impressive, to say the least. He said that the 500 grain FPS would be perfect for my application and should offer awesome penetration.

North Fork gained a customer tonight!

Not surprising, Franz and the other gents there are good folks. The guys there are engineers by day at their 'normal' jobs and then work in the evenings at North Fork. It's been awhile now, but when I first started working with their bullets I spent a number of hours on the phone with them discussing bullets. If you ever make your way to DSC, they have a booth there and you can meet them.
 
Not surprising, Franz and the other gents there are good folks. The guys there are engineers by day at their 'normal' jobs and then work in the evenings at North Fork. It's been awhile now, but when I first started working with their bullets I spent a number of hours on the phone with them discussing bullets. If you ever make your way to DSC, they have a booth there and you can meet them.
Wow, so North Fork isn't a full-time gig for them? They sure make great stuff!
 
Wow, so North Fork isn't a full-time gig for them? They sure make great stuff!

The "factory" part of the shop is running during the day manufacturing bullets. But the engineering is done at night. Those guys are also shooters and hunters and decided to combine their mechanical engineering skills with their passion for hunting.

Yep, I do love their bonded core bullets. All of the bullets I've recovered were text book examples of how their advertised to work. I've not worked with the solids yet, but plan to when the time for a DG hunt arises.

I do think the A-Frames from a terminal ballistics point of view are virtually the equal of the NF bonded cores. But even though the A-Frames are shorter, they typically for me have required more powder to achieve the same velocities. I've also found the NF's easier to develop a load for, perhaps just one person's experience however.

The only drawback I find to using the NF bullets is that they're true diameter for the caliber. If you measure say a .308 NF bullet, it is truly .308, whereas another bullet may be .306-.307. Why is this a drawback? It makes the NF bullets less tolerant to uneven neck thickness. When first working with their bullets in my .300WM and my son's .308 Win, I'd find that roughly every 4th shot would be a flyer. Discussed this with Franz in Dallas and he figured it was my brass. The solution was to either turn my necks or buy better brass. I chose the latter and use either Lapua or Norma brass in the medium calibers. Once I made that change, no more flyers.

By the way this problem only seems to be in the smaller calibers. In my .375H&H I've not seen this problem and use Remington brass. So hopefully this won't be an issue in your Lott.
 
The "factory" part of the shop is running during the day manufacturing bullets. But the engineering is done at night. Those guys are also shooters and hunters and decided to combine their mechanical engineering skills with their passion for hunting.

Yep, I do love their bonded core bullets. All of the bullets I've recovered were text book examples of how their advertised to work. I've not worked with the solids yet, but plan to when the time for a DG hunt arises.

I do think the A-Frames from a terminal ballistics point of view are virtually the equal of the NF bonded cores. But even though the A-Frames are shorter, they typically for me have required more powder to achieve the same velocities. I've also found the NF's easier to develop a load for, perhaps just one person's experience however.

The only drawback I find to using the NF bullets is that they're true diameter for the caliber. If you measure say a .308 NF bullet, it is truly .308, whereas another bullet may be .306-.307. Why is this a drawback? It makes the NF bullets less tolerant to uneven neck thickness. When first working with their bullets in my .300WM and my son's .308 Win, I'd find that roughly every 4th shot would be a flyer. Discussed this with Franz in Dallas and he figured it was my brass. The solution was to either turn my necks or buy better brass. I chose the latter and use either Lapua or Norma brass in the medium calibers. Once I made that change, no more flyers.

By the way this problem only seems to be in the smaller calibers. In my .375H&H I've not seen this problem and use Remington brass. So hopefully this won't be an issue in your Lott.
Great info, Phil! Thanks so much for taking the time to respond in such detail.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
60,557
Messages
1,320,611
Members
111,850
Latest member
LazaroSkag
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

Safari Dave wrote on GUN & TROPHY INSURANCE's profile.
I have been using a "Personal Property" rider on my State Farm homeowner's policy to cover guns when I travel with them.
I have several firearms, but only one is worth over $20K (A Heym double rifle).
Very interested.
Would firearms be covered for damage, as well as, complete loss?
I'll can let the State Farm rider cover my watches...
Behind the scenes of taking that perfect picture.....






WhatsApp Image 2025-04-23 at 09.58.07.jpeg
krokodil42 wrote on Jager Waffen74's profile.
Good Evening Evert One.
Would like to purchase 16 Ga 2.50 ammo !!
Rattler1 wrote on trperk1's profile.
trperk1, I bought the Kimber Caprivi 375 back in an earlier post. You attached a target with an impressive three rounds touching 100 yards. I took the 2x10 VX5 off and put a VX6 HD Gen 2 1x6x24 Duplex Firedot on the rifle. It's definitely a shooter curious what loads you used for the group. Loving this rifle so fun to shoot. Africa 2026 Mozambique. Buff and PG. Any info appreciated.
Ready for the hunt with HTK Safaris
 
Top