MS 9x56
AH elite
Are you crimping your cartridges?
@MS 9x56My problem with Barnes is the level of copper fouling and degrading accuracy. That and the bullet length crowding powder space. Efficacy is fine but I don't enjoy spending all the extra time cleaning copper out of my barrel all the time. At the speeds I typically load to, the tried and true cup and core bullets work well for me. Just one mans opinion.
@Rum RunnerI'm a hand-loader and this post is very timely! The other day I decided to get my Parker Hale 7mm Rem Mag back in action and started looking around for bullets. After an exhaustive search, I found some! 150 gr TTSX.
At first I was disappointed I couldn't find anything heavier, then I realized Barnes doesn't make a heavier TTSX bullet in 7mm. So, to take advantage of the bullet, I have to get it going fast, I'm thinking around 2900 fps. Unfortunately, the barrel is only 21 inches long, so I'm going to be on the high end of the load recipe, but I'm going to work up to it.
I took my .270 Win to Africa last year and was shooting 140 gr TSX. The bullets performed perfectly, but take a look at this one. This was a quartering shot, so the bullet nearly passed through the entire body. Anyway, this was only about a 100 yard shot. I would expect more expansion (muzzle velocity was 2700 fps).
Barnes bullets love speed, and, from what I can tell, you need to be some distance from the lands. So I'm in the process of bumping up the speed of my .270 for the TSX, and finding a speed for the 7mm TTSX (I'm looking for around 2900 fps). Here is the problem, I run into high pressure issues (like in the .270, the brass would flatten, ruining the primer hole size) with Barnes bullets when ever I get close to the recommended max. I don't have this problem with the A-Frames or Sirocco bullets. Fantastic bullets, you just have to watch the pressure...
View attachment 383164