I disagree with Arthur S. about the "uselessness of this caliber in Europe". Of course, there are people who get a moose in the spine on the run (I sometimes hunt with this guy). But it is better when there is a large caliber that corrects the flaws of aiming. A couple of times I participated in the procedure of searching for a wounded moose . Once he went for 2 km through snow-covered swamps, and then only fell (a guy from our team hit him in the liver). When we pulled out the carcass, I fell through the ice up to my chest a couple of times - and this is a small pleasure. But okay-elk, but there is also a large boar, and it does not always run from the hunter. 9, 3x62? But this is the same cartridge case as the 30-06, the same volume of gunpowder, the same energy.
9, 3x64-unique cartridge. Powerful, with reliable recharge. It has already been written that this cartridge is used by the Russian military. But it was repeated in Russia as hunting, in fact - invented a second time. We had a designer Blum, who made hunting cartridges based on common military cartridges in the 50s, in particular 220 Russian, and even a prototype of Grendel. But he considered it necessary to have a powerful 9 mm cartridge for our conditions, and re-designed the Brennecke cartridge.Original Design documentation was not available, and Blum developed the cartridge anew, with only sample measurements. Then the concept of copyright did not interfere with the dissemination of information
. And when the military was looking in 90-th for a suitable cartridge for their purposes, they hardly even heard the name Brenneke, but the hunting cartridge seemed appropriate to them. This speaks primarily about the reliability of the design, otherwise it would not have passed military tests. As a former militaryman, I would hate to see these cartridges used in combat. But hunting is different.