Nhoro
AH fanatic
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2014
- Messages
- 998
- Reaction score
- 1,881
- Location
- Harare,Zimbabwe
- Media
- 29
- Member of
- Cleveland Gun Club
- Hunted
- Zimbabwe
Great, not at all...just like to prove that each have their preferences....I guess you do not hunt using the Prado...you could I guess.....my cousins uncle....haha funny...one from Texas, one from Minneapolis and the other not sure....
Lets see the 458 WM was designed to fire a 510gr bullet @ 2150 fps, sadly it could not and still cannot achieve this. I chronographed Winchester ammo at 1800-1900 Fps, scary stuff...had on more than one occasion experienced issues with lack of penetration when used by people I have guided, others had issues with stuck cases as pressures had soured due to hot hand loads trying to achieve what it cannot....
Why load light for caliber bullets? Your own figures indicate it cannot achieve 2150 Fps with 480gr let alone a 510 gr bullet...
It has the smallest case capacity of all the 458 cartridges....93 gr water compared to the next one up the Lott @ 103 gr water.
Loaded with S321 71.8gr will yield only 2083 fps and 4818 ft lbs at a pressure of 58079 psi
The Lott with S321 80gr will yield 2250 fps and 5621 ft lbs
So the one falls far short and the other exceeds the target.
I prefer not to fool around with marginal calibers when it comes to DG therefore I use a 500 Jeff and have never been disappointing never mind the situation, unfortunately the same cannot be said of the 458 WM.
Hell if it works for you and you think it is the right caliber for even elephant under the worst conditions who am I to argue....for me it is no good for that task, it is marginal, does not achieve what it was supposed to.
If one needs to load lighter for caliber bullets to try and get a caliber to achieve what it should then rather step down in caliber.
I would use a 404 Jeff, 416 Rigby and even the 375 H&H with 340 gr bullets long before I even consider the 458 WM........
I started a thread some months back about this and guess what-Not one single person could provide one single chronograph result of 458 Win mag ammo that didn't make specification.Do a search-read it. Not one single person could bring any factual evidence that of all these fabled underperforming factory rounds. Of all the 458 win mags in all the world and no one would provide any chrono evidence of failure ? hundreds of people had something to say but no one came up with the goods.
And stop cherry picking 'facts':
You give one chrono result of a cartridge no longer in production (so 20 -30 years ago ?), from a company that has admitted to gluing undersized bullets into cartridges/spilling powder out on the production line and using cheap ass powder that clumps. However, you can't buy them so they are irrelevant. Get a current production factory round or better yet do the whole lot and put you money where your mouth is!
In addition you have run a computer simulation to further back up your facts. If you go to Peregrine bullets and look at their load data-(freely available on their website)-you will find the 500 gr VRG 2/3 copper monolithic data listing 71.8 gr OPTIMUM load for 2083 fps. They then list a MAX load of 74 gr for 2200 fps. Maybe it was just an oversight on your part to leave out the max load data. Maybe there is another bullet out there which uses exactly 71.8 gr to get 2083 fps and it is a max load ?
There is really no need to jump on every guys who has 458 win mag and belittle his choice and tell him that he is an idiot for having that calibre. It is not a Lott/Dakota/Rigby/Ackley/Watts. But all evidence shows that it delivers on its claims.If you dont want to use it yourself-all well and good. there is no need to to bully and fabricate 'facts'. I have seen the evidence with my own eyes- it makes 2140 fps at 18 degrees C with a 480 gr bullet with an uncompressed mild load. Same specifications as the vintage 470 NE but with better sectional density.
Last edited by a moderator: