IVW, Opposite Pole, and the reasoning behind each opinion?
Thanks!
Heym makes a fantastic rifle, and the Heym double I handled (in 9.3x74R) was a true work of art with spectacular timber and engravings with significant amount of gold plating etc. - decent British house would be proud of it. The rifle handled beautifully, and it was hard to fault it in any way. So why did I go for custom order Krieghoff instead? With the options I wanted the price for both Heym and Krieghoff was virtually the same. But:
1 - Like Blaser (and a number of others), Krieghoff can be carried loaded but not cocked. This is safer than traditional safety. Heym is not an unsafe rifle, and it has intercepting sears, but uncocked is safer. Of course, the most important safety is the one in between the shooter’s ears, but I prefer a safer design over a less safe one regardless.
2 - with K-gun, in smaller calibres (up to 9.3x74R, I think), barrel regulation is user adjustable. I have a 470 and 9.3x74R barrel set and have changed the regulation of the smaller barrels for my load. It is quite simple though time consuming. It gives the shooter more flexibility.
3 - Krieghoff can be fitted (mine is) with what they call Intelligent Ejector System. Break the rifle cocked, and the spent shells eject, break it uncocked, and they extract - best of both worlds.
4 - Current production Krieghoffs come with scope bases or red dot mount platforms depending on calibre. If you choose to mount optics on them you can do it without gunsmith work on the gun.
My $0.02 worth