Good Gun Deals This Week

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2024-07-23 at 8.10.49 AM.png
    Screenshot 2024-07-23 at 8.10.49 AM.png
    2.5 MB · Views: 89
Reto knows what’s he’s doing. I’d like to see where the bids end up
I'd put money this isn't a rifle Reto built. He might have sold it on consignment at some point. It isn't anywhere near his level of quality and honestly it looks to me like someone is using his literature for marketing purposes. The misspelling of his name should raise enough questions as is.

He has posted on his blog recently about people selling guns as his due to them having a Buehler safety on them.
 
I'd put money this isn't a rifle Reto built. He might have sold it on consignment at some point. It isn't anywhere near his level of quality and honestly it looks to me like someone is using his literature for marketing purposes. The misspelling of his name should raise enough questions as is.

He has posted on his blog recently about people selling guns as his due to them having a Buehler safety on them.
I’d does seem rather pedestrian, maybe he did a bit of work like the safety, peep sight, and new front sight.
 
That rifle was on GB by the same seller about 2-3 months ago. Brought around $2500? Seller must have backed out or the seller had a shill bidder running it up.

Nice looking rifle but I've never understood QD scope rings, and then having to install an iron sight to use it.
 
You don't see these often. Most of the 360 bores were ruined between 1960 and 1990 by conversion to 9.3x74r when brass and dies weren't available.

Finding a survivor is quite a rarity.
I’ve seen that gun in person and she’s quite beatiful. They also have a pre-war Holland Dominion
 
My 9x56ms 1905 doesn't have a tang sight, or scope mounts. What I don't know is if putting correct claw mounts on it would reduce its value, I have a few period correct scopes.


Tough call.

If a 'scope would make the rifle more practical / useful to you, that clearly has value to you. It's your firearm.

On the other side; nothing can be made 'original' again once permanently altered, though a _properly mounted_ claw 'scope was, indeed, a period correct enhancement.

If one can arrange to have Joel Dorleac or other expert of his caliber (there aren't many) do the work and keep documentation I would think future resale value would be protected if not improved. Such craftsmanship and expertise, however, comes dear.

There is no 'budget' mounting to a pre WW2 MS that would likely produce an acceptable result.


MS Claw Mount  Dorleac .458.jpg

Dorleac 'low mounted' claw on later model MS.
 
Last edited:
Tough call.

If a 'scope would make the rifle more practical / useful to you, that clearly has value to you. It's your firearm.

On the other side; nothing can be made 'original' again once permanently altered, though a _properly mounted_ claw 'scope was, indeed, a period correct enhancement.

If one can arrange to have Joel Dorleac or other expert of his caliber (there aren't many) do the work and keep documentation I would think future resale value would be protected if not improved. Such craftsmanship and expertise, however, comes dear.

There is no 'budget' mounting to a pre WW2 MS that would likely produce an acceptable result.


View attachment 621275
Dorleac 'low mounted' claw on later model MS.

It's about $700 for an EAW mount for the MS. Works great. Many were pre-drilled and tapped, those that were not it's a fairly minor penalty to originality.

The bigger issue is that in order to get an excellent low install of an optic, you need to modify the safety. That does erode originality, unless it was already done by a customizer like George Gibbs, Daniel Fraser, or the other British firms building best quality custom MS rifles in the Golden Era.

High scope mounts are an affront to God and civilized man.
 
Many were pre-drilled and tapped, those that were not it's a fairly minor penalty to originality.

High scope mounts are an affront to God and civilized man.

The 'pre drilled' MS were of post WW2 manufacture, high mounted 'scopes with see through mounts are authentic to pre WW2 models as that is what was installed when ordered 'back in the day'.

Stoeger, 1939:
MS ST39 51 Mannlicher Schoenauer details 03.jpg

Mauser Stoeger 1939 Page 45 Detail.jpg
 
Tough call.

If a 'scope would make the rifle more practical / useful to you, that clearly has value to you. It's your firearm.

On the other side; nothing can be made 'original' again once permanently altered, though a _properly mounted_ claw 'scope was, indeed, a period correct enhancement.

If one can arrange to have Joel Dorleac or other expert of his caliber (there aren't many) do the work and keep documentation I would think future resale value would be protected if not improved. Such craftsmanship and expertise, however, comes dear.

There is no 'budget' mounting to a pre WW2 MS that would likely produce an acceptable result.


View attachment 621275
Dorleac 'low mounted' claw on later model MS.
That's what I was thinking, the mount and fitting would be around 2 grand. I could do it myself, but like you mentioned, it wouldn't have the prominence of a really known Smith doing it. I may just end up handing it off to my son.
 
It's about $700 for an EAW mount for the MS. Works great. Many were pre-drilled and tapped, those that were not it's a fairly minor penalty to originality.

The bigger issue is that in order to get an excellent low install of an optic, you need to modify the safety. That does erode originality, unless it was already done by a customizer like George Gibbs, Daniel Fraser, or the other British firms building best quality custom MS rifles in the Golden Era.

High scope mounts are an affront to God and civilized man.
This is a pre ww1 rifle, no holes or marks and in very good condition.

13709.jpeg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's what I was thinking, the mount and fitting would be around 2 grand. I could do it myself, but like you mentioned, it wouldn't have the prominence of a really known Smith doing it. I may just end up handing it off to my son.

I wouldn’t spend $2k on a dorleac mount. It ruins the originality by introducing a barrel saddle. No benefit. EAW pivot moun for mannlicher is $650 and requires 4 holes drilled and tapped, rather than extensive permanent adding of metal parts and rebluing.

To reverse the install, all that remains would be 4 plugged screw holes, just like many mannlichers have and all had in the later iterations.
 
That's what I was thinking, the mount and fitting would be around 2 grand. I could do it myself, but like you mentioned, it wouldn't have the prominence of a really known Smith doing it. I may just end up handing it off to my son.

Sounds like a worthwhile endeavour either way.
 
This is alot of rifle for the money at the current exchange rate. Plus 404 ammo is currently in-stock.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2024-07-26 at 8.22.55 AM.png
    Screenshot 2024-07-26 at 8.22.55 AM.png
    3.5 MB · Views: 61
  • Screenshot 2024-07-26 at 8.22.57 AM.png
    Screenshot 2024-07-26 at 8.22.57 AM.png
    2.4 MB · Views: 58
Tihs a nice Ribgy .416 Rem I have for sale.
Not sure if I am following protocol as I am an FFL.
Moderators please let me know and I will take it down as I realize Classifeds don't allow dealers.
Its a fine rifle and would rather go to an AH member-open to offers for AH members only.
Thanks
 

Attachments

Tihs a nice Ribgy .416 Rem I have for sale.
Not sure if I am following protocol as I am an FFL.
Moderators please let me know and I will take it down as I realize Classifeds don't allow dealers.
Its a fine rifle and would rather go to an AH member-open to offers for AH members only.
Thanks



You 100% sure it’s a 416 remington? Not a 416 rigby?
 
You 100% sure it’s a 416 remington? Not a 416 rigby?
Yes The Barrel is clearly stamped 416 Remington not Rigby. I will try and get a shot of it.
I have never seen one before in this cal
 

Forum statistics

Threads
57,895
Messages
1,242,467
Members
102,275
Latest member
Amp Wellbeing
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

Grz63 wrote on Werty's profile.
(cont'd)
Rockies museum,
CM Russel museum and lewis and Clark interpretative center
Horseback riding in Summer star ranch
Charlo bison range and Garnet ghost town
Flathead lake, road to the sun and hiking in Glacier NP
and back to SLC (via Ogden and Logan)
Grz63 wrote on Werty's profile.
Good Morning,
I plan to visit MT next Sept.
May I ask you to give me your comments; do I forget something ? are my choices worthy ? Thank you in advance
Philippe (France)

Start in Billings, Then visit little big horn battlefield,
MT grizzly encounter,
a hot springs (do you have good spots ?)
Looking to buy a 375 H&H or .416 Rem Mag if anyone has anything they want to let go of
Erling Søvik wrote on dankykang's profile.
Nice Z, 1975 ?
Tintin wrote on JNevada's profile.
Hi Jay,

Hope you're well.

I'm headed your way in January.

Attending SHOT Show has been a long time bucket list item for me.

Finally made it happen and I'm headed to Vegas.

I know you're some distance from Vegas - but would be keen to catch up if it works out.

Have a good one.

Mark
 
Top